MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407240255 · doi:10.1093/infdis/jiaf051

Is Systemic Dissemination of BCG Following Neonatal Vaccination Required for Protection Against <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i>?

2025· article· en· W4407240255 on OpenAlexafffund
Tobias R. Kollmann, Nelly Amenyogbe, Frederik Schaltz‐Buchholzer, Ole Bæk, James I. Campbell, David J. Lynn, Anita J Campbell, Peter Aaby, Christine Stabell Benn, Mihai G. Netea, Maziar Divangahi

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Infectious Diseases · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmune responses and vaccinations
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health CentreDalhousie University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchOpen Philanthropy ProjectNovo Nordisk FondenDalhousie UniversityDet Sundhedsvidenskabelige Fakultet, Københavns UniversitetNational Institutes of HealthNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesBill and Melinda Gates Foundation
KeywordsVaccinationTuberculosisMedicineBCG vaccineVirologyImmunologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tuberculosis (TB) is caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) and is a leading cause of death. BCG is the only licensed TB vaccine. Preclinical studies have shown that in adults, intravenous administration of BCG improves protection against TB. We hypothesize that intradermal administration of BCG to the human newborn leads to low-grade BCG bacteremia and that this systemic dissemination improves protection against Mtb infection. This hypothesis is based on supporting observations including animal and human studies. It is a testable hypothesis and offers to deliver immediately actionable insight to advance the global efforts against TB.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.223
Threshold uncertainty score0.374

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Infectious DiseasesSame topicImmune responses and vaccinationsFrench-language works237,207