MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407240463 · doi:10.3390/cancers17040569

K-Means Clustering of Hyperpolarised 13C-MRI Identifies Intratumoral Perfusion/Metabolism Mismatch in Renal Cell Carcinoma as the Best Predictor of the Highest Grade

2025· article· en· W4407240463 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ines Horvat‐Menih, Alixander S. Khan, Mary A. McLean, João Duarte, Eva Serrão, Stephan Ursprung, Joshua Kaggie, Andrew B. Gill, Andrew N. Priest, Mireia Crispin‐Ortuzar, Anne Y. Warren, Sarah J. Welsh, Thomas J. Mitchell, Grant D. Stewart, Ferdia A. Gallagher

Bibliographic record

VenueCancers · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal cell carcinoma treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research CentreMark Foundation For Cancer ResearchLundbeckfondenCancer Research UKCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
KeywordsClear cell renal cell carcinomaRenal cell carcinomaMedicineBiopsyPerfusionMagnetic resonance imagingRadiologyPathologyNuclear medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Early and accurate grading of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) improves patient risk stratification and has implications for clinical management and mortality. However, current diagnostic approaches using imaging and renal mass biopsy have limited specificity and may lead to undergrading. Methods: This study explored the use of hyperpolarised [1-13C]pyruvate MRI (HP 13C-MRI) to identify the most aggressive areas within the tumour of patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) as a method to guide biopsy targeting and to reduce undergrading. Six patients with ccRCC underwent presurgical HP 13C-MRI and conventional contrast-enhanced MRI. From the imaging data, three k-means clusters were computed by combining the kPL as a marker of metabolic activity, and the 13C-pyruvate signal-to-noise ratio (SNRPyr) as a perfusion surrogate. The combined clusters were compared to those derived from individual parameters and to those derived from the percentage of enhancement on the nephrographic phase (%NG). The diagnostic performance of each cluster was assessed based on its ability to predict the highest histological tumour grade in postsurgical tissue samples. The postsurgical tissue samples underwent immunohistochemical staining for the pyruvate transporter (monocarboxylate transporter 1, MCT1), as well as RNA and whole-exome sequencing. Results: The clustering approach combining SNRPyr and kPL demonstrated the best performance for predicting the highest tumour grade: specificity 85%; sensitivity 64%; positive predictive value 82%; and negative predictive value 68%. Epithelial MCT1 was identified as the major determinant of the HP 13C-MRI signal. The perfusion/metabolism mismatch cluster showed an increased expression of metabolic genes and markers of aggressiveness. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the potential of using HP 13C-MRI-derived metabolic clusters to identify intratumoral variations in tumour grade with high specificity. This work supports the use of metabolic imaging to guide biopsies to the most aggressive tumour regions and could potentially reduce sampling error.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancersSame topicRenal cell carcinoma treatmentFrench-language works237,207