MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407249611 · doi:10.1055/s-0045-1803254

Metabolic Profiling of Meningioma Reveals Novel Subgroup-Specific Biologic Insights and Outcome Dependencies

2025· article· en· W4407249611 on OpenAlexaff
Alexander Landry, Justin Wang, Jeff Liu, Vikas Patil, Wenjiang Zhang, Julio Sosa, Yosef Ellenbogen, Chloe Gui, Andrew Ajisebutu, Thomas Kislinger, Eric X. Chen, Farshad Nassiri, Gelareh Zadeh

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurological Surgery Part B Skull Base · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMeningioma and schwannoma management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProfiling (computer programming)Computational biologyMeningiomaBioinformaticsMedicineBiologyComputer sciencePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Prior studies have elucidated the presence of four consensus molecular groups (MGs) of meningioma, with unique underlying biology and outcomes. The hyperactivation of metabolic pathways may be associated with tumor growth, and therefore poor outcomes, in the so-called hypermetabolic (MG3) tumors, and there is a need to better understand the metabolic landscape of these tumors. This study is the first to study the global metabolon of meningioma in the context of modern molecular subgroups. Methods: Untargeted metabolic profiling (Metabolon Inc.) was performed on 53 meningiomas representing each molecular group and WHO grade. Prognostic biochemicals were identified using Cox regression and further investigated using RNA and protein-based pathway analyses. A larger cohort with available RNA sequencing ( n = 121) was used to further explore the prognostic influence of relevant pathways, and biochemicals of interest were validated on a subset of these samples ( n = 35) using targeted high performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS). Results: Global metabolic profiling identified 560 unique biochemicals for downstream analysis. The abundance of N6-trimethyllysine was associated with significantly earlier time to recurrence highly prognostic on our whole cohort (HR [95%CI] = 3.18 [1.45–26.23], p = 0.004) and within hypermetabolic (MG3) tumors (HR [95% CI] = 6.73 [1.72–6.97], p = 0.006); pyruvate was associated with worse outcomes in proliferative (MG4) tumors specifically (HR [95%CI] = 5.65 [1.073–29.71], p = 0.041). Analysis of implicated gene pathways demonstrated that upregulation of the oxidative phosphorylation pathway portends worse outcomes in the hypermetabolic subgroup but, surprisingly, better outcomes in the proliferative subgroup. By contrast, upregulated lactate transporters were associated with worse outcomes in proliferative, but not hypermetabolic, meningiomas. Conclusion: This is the first study to demonstrate a subgroup-specific prognostic role of N6-trimethyllysine and pyruvate in meningioma, offering increasingly granular outcome predictions using a widely accessible technique (HPLC-MS/MS). In addition, we demonstrated key differences in energy utilization between hypermetabolic and proliferative tumors, both of which are associated with poor outcomes, suggesting fundamental differences in preferred energy utilization and reinforcing a need for subgroup-specific therapies. Publication History Article published online: 07 February 2025 © 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neurological Surgery Part B Skull BaseSame topicMeningioma and schwannoma managementFrench-language works237,207