MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407250439 · doi:10.1055/s-0045-1803898

Tool-Tissue Interaction Forces in Hemangioblastoma

2025· article· en· W4407250439 on OpenAlexaff
Abdulrahman Albakr, Amir Baghdadi, Rahul Singh, Sanju Lama, Garnette Sutherland

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurological Surgery Part B Skull Base · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCell Adhesion Molecules Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceHuman–computer interaction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Significance and Goals: The surgical removal of intracranial hemangioblastoma presents various technical difficulties that may be hard to convey to trainees. This study aims to present insights on the forces exerted by a sensorized bipolar forceps on tissue, measured in Newtons (N), during hemangioblastoma procedures. Methods: A total of seven surgeons participated in six surgeries for intracranial hemangioblastoma, divided into two groups: one mentor ( n = 1) and six trainees ( n = 6, ranging from PGY 1 to 6, including clinical fellowship). Tool-tissue force profiles were assessed using sensorized bipolar forceps across five specific surgical tasks: (1) dissection, (2) coagulation, (3) retraction, (4) pulling, and (5) manipulation. Each trial's force profile included metrics such as force duration, averages, maximums, minimums, range, standard deviation (SD), and correlation coefficients. We compared force errors from unsuccessful trials—classified as bleeding or incomplete—with successful trials. Results: Data was gathered from 718 trials. The average (SD) force exerted across all surgical tasks and experience levels was found to be 0.20 ± 0.17 N. The force applied by trainee surgeons was significantly lower than that by the mentor (0.15 N vs. 0.24 N; p < 0.0001). There were 18 unsuccessful trials (4.5%), with four resulting in bleeding and the others being incomplete. The force during unsuccessful bleeding trials was greater than in successful ones (0.3 [0.09] N vs. 0.17 [0.11] N; p = 0.0401). Increased force was noted toward the end of surgeries (0.17 N vs. 0.20 N; p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Measuring tool-tissue forces in hemangioblastoma surgeries, combined with feedback provided to surgeons, has the potential to improve surgical training and help prevent bleeding linked to excessive force errors. Publication History Article published online: 07 February 2025 © 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neurological Surgery Part B Skull BaseSame topicCell Adhesion Molecules ResearchFrench-language works237,207