MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407252955 · doi:10.18632/aging.206200

Exploring the role of acylated ghrelin and gut microbiome in delineating cognitive health in the elderly

2025· article· en· W4407252955 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
R J Dash, Varsha Satish, Giriprasad Venugopal, Bodepudi Narasimha Rao, Debapriya Bandhyopadhyay, Sanjeev Kumar Bhoi, Balamurugan Ramadass

Bibliographic record

VenueAging · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGut microbiota and health
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAll-India Institute of Medical Sciences
KeywordsFaecalibacterium prausnitziiDementiaGhrelinMicrobiomeCognitive declineBifidobacterium longumMedicineCognitionGut floraBacteroidesInternal medicineBiologyBioinformaticsLactobacillusDiseaseImmunologyBifidobacteriumPsychiatryGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: With increased life expectancy, there is an increase in aging population and prevalence of dementia. Ghrelin is a key regulator of spatial memory and cognition. The gut microbiome may affect the circulating levels of unacylated ghrelin (UAG) and acylated ghrelin (AG). Thus, we explore the potential association of the gut microbiome, AG, and cognitive health in the aging dementia patient. METHODS: 40 dementia patients and 40 controls were recruited. Fecal Microbiome analysis using 16S rRNA sequencing was performed on 18 samples. A mixed-method approach was employed for robust interpretation. RESULTS: was associated with Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Scale. DISCUSSION: This pilot study indicates a complex interaction between AG, gut microbiome, and cognitive scores. Increased AG corresponds to both dementia and gut dysbiosis, intricately interconnecting the gut-brain axis. The circulating AG and associated gut microbiome might be a putative biomarker for dementia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAgingSame topicGut microbiota and healthFrench-language works237,207