MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407253058 · doi:10.3390/rs17040570

Real-Time Multiresolution Management of Spatiotemporal Earth Observation Data Using DGGS

2025· article· en· W4407253058 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Amir Mirzai Golpayegani, Mahdee Hasan, Faramarz Samavati

Bibliographic record

VenueRemote Sensing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacs
KeywordsEarth observationRemote sensingGeologyComputer scienceGeodesySatelliteAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effective management of spatiotemporal Earth observation data is a significant challenge due to their growing size and scale, geometric distortion, temporal gaps, and restricted access. In this article, we introduce a novel methodology utilizing a Discrete Global Grid System (DGGS) to address a set of challenges related to spatiotemporal data storage with a live updating mechanism, the multiresolution processing of an arbitrary region of interest (ROI) in real time, and the approximation of missing data in a smooth, continuous manner. We use reverse Chaikin subdivision and B-spline curve fitting to handle temporal data gaps, allowing for real-time updates. Additionally, our work presents a triangular wavelet scheme to incorporate a flexible, tensor-based multiresolution storage scheme for spatiotemporal raster data. The case study we present uses data from the RADARSAT Constellation Mission (RCM) of the Canadian Space Agency (CSA). Our system enables the dynamic retrieval and visualization of time-varying data for a user-defined ROI. The obtained results demonstrate that our method ensures high data fidelity while making spatiotemporal data more accessible across various practical applications in Earth observation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRemote SensingSame topicGeological Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207