MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4407266516 · doi:10.1016/j.jglr.2025.102536

The lampricide 3-trifluoromethyl-4-nitrophenol (TFM) stimulates oxygen consumption by larval sea lamprey in a dose-dependent manner

2025· article· en· W4407266516 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Hugo Flávio, Michael P. Wilkie

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Great Lakes Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPhysiological and biochemical adaptations
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaU.S. Geological SurveyGreat Lakes Fishery Commission
KeywordsLampreyLarvaOxygenFisheryConsumption (sociology)TrifluoromethylEnvironmental chemistryChemistryBiologyEnvironmental scienceEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sea lamprey ( Petromyzon marinus ) are an invasive species in the Laurentian Great Lakes, where parasitism by blood-feeding juvenile lampreys greatly reduced populations of economically and culturally important native fishes in the early-mid 1900s. To control sea lamprey populations, the lampricide 3-trifluoromethyl-4-nitrophenol (TFM) is added to streams infested with larval sea lamprey. Sea lamprey have a lower capacity to detoxify TFM than most non-target fishes, making it a highly effective pesticide. TFM decreases ATP production by disrupting oxidative phosphorylation in the mitochondria, leading to an increase in mitochondrial oxygen consumption. However, little is known about how TFM affects whole animal oxygen consumption in sea lamprey and other fishes. To test the hypothesis that TFM has dose-dependent effects on larval sea lamprey metabolic rate, we measured the mass-specific oxygen consumption rates ( Ṁ O 2 ) of larval sea lamprey using intermittent-flow respirometry during TFM exposure. Exposure to increasing concentrations of TFM led to stepwise increases in Ṁ O 2 in larval sea lamprey, resulting in death after Ṁ O 2 reached levels equivalent to their known maximum metabolic rates. Similar measurements of Ṁ O 2 could be used to determine the relative TFM sensitivity of non-target species to better assess the potential impacts of TFM on resident fisheries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Great Lakes Research→Same topicPhysiological and biochemical adaptations→French-language works237,207→