Evaluation of phenotypic and behavioral toxicity of micro- and nano-plastic polystyrene particles in larval zebrafish (<i>Danio rerio</i>)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Plastic particles have been found in all environments and it is necessary to understand the risks these particles pose in, and to, the environment. The objectives of this work were to understand the toxic effects of varying size and concentration of polystyrene (PS) micro- and nano-plastics in zebrafish embryos and their fate within the larvae. In this work, larval zebrafish (Danio rerio) were exposed to six sizes (0.05, 0.25, 0.53, 2.1, 6.02, and 10.2 µm diameter) and concentrations (0.0005 to 0.2 µg/µL) of PS micro/nanoplastics particles. The zebrafish embryo toxicity (ZET) and the general and behavioral toxicity (GBT) assays were used to determine particle toxicity in embryos. Behavioral analysis was performed and micro/nanoplastics uptake and organ distribution were assessed. Phenotypic and behavioral toxicity was observed in all exposures with the exception of 0.25 µm particle-exposed larvae. Significant phenotypic toxicity was seen at the highest tested exposure concentration, with some sizes showing potential recovery as time increased in the assay. Behavioral analysis demonstrated a decrease in baseline activity across all micro- and nano-plastic sizes. Significant increases in light-dark responses were recorded in ZET assays of smaller-sized particles and no significant effects were observed at larger sizes. Significant decreases in this response were reported in the GBT assays of all tested sizes with the exception of the 0.05-µm particles. These assays demonstrate the general, developmental, and neurotoxicity of micro/nanoplastics to a model organism, which can be used to infer individual and population-level effects of exposure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".