MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407284060 · doi:10.1016/j.gore.2025.101693

Uterine endometrioid adenocarcinoma with pilomatrix-like differentiation: A case report and review of the literature

2025· article· en· W4407284060 on OpenAlexaff
Leah Rusnell, Zainab Al-Shamma, Steven Bisch

Bibliographic record

VenueGynecologic Oncology Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer and Skin Lesions
Canadian institutionsFoothills Medical Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAdenocarcinomaClear-cell adenocarcinomaGynecologyCancer researchInternal medicineCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Pilomatrix-like high grade endometrioid carcinoma (PiMHEC) is a rare aggressive endometrial cancer. • PiMHEC bears hallmark immunohistochemical features of the more common cutaneous counterpart. • Widespread metastasis is frequent at initial diagnosis. • Reported therapeutic options include chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, radiotherapy, and surgery. • Clinicians may consider early immune checkpoint inhibitor use particularly for MMR deficient tumors. We present a rare case of uterine pilomatrix-like high grade endometrioid carcinoma (PiMHEC). We provide a thorough review of the 16 other PiMHEC cases reported to date, overview of our index case, and considerations for therapeutic approach with a focus on molecular subtyping. This 44-year-old patient presented with widespread metastatic disease at time of diagnosis and initial clinical improvement with combination chemoradiotherapy. Immunotherapy was initiated later in the clinical course and the patient ultimately died of their disease 6 months post-diagnosis. Future clinicians may utilize PiMHEC case reports to formulate a therapeutic regimen and consider early initiation of immunotherapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.398

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGynecologic Oncology ReportsSame topicCancer and Skin LesionsFrench-language works237,207