MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407284223 · doi:10.1186/s44314-025-00018-5

Pretreatment of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) using physicochemical methods and their effects on biodegradation

2025· article· en· W4407284223 on OpenAlexafffund
Ruth Amanna, Sudip Kumar Rakshit

Bibliographic record

VenueBiotechnology for the Environment · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMicroplastics and Plastic Pollution
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
FundersCanada Research ChairsLakehead University
KeywordsPolyethylene terephthalateBiodegradationPolyethyleneChemistryPulp and paper industryMaterials scienceOrganic chemistryComposite materialEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Recently, biodegradation has gained importance as a potential solution to alleviate pollution. This study dives into the physicochemical transformations of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) to enhance biodegradation efficiency. PET films were subjected to pretreatments, including UV irradiation, thermal oxidation, size reduction, and a combination of thermal oxidation and size-reduction pretreatments. These pretreated samples were then biodegraded using either an immobilized enzyme or the whole-cell Thermobifida fusca YX. The physicochemical effects of these treatments were evaluated through techniques such as attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and weight-loss analysis. The findings revealed that UV irradiation caused repetitive cycles of photo-oxidation over 3 h, which impaired biodegradation due to increased crystallinity. Conversely, thermal oxidation improved biodegradation up to an optimal temperature of 80 °C. Higher temperatures were favorable for whole-cell biodegradation, while slightly lower temperatures (70–80 °C) were optimal for enzyme-mediated processes. A similar trend was observed for thermally oxidized size-reduced particles, with the smallest particle size exhibiting the highest biodegradation rates, 21.25 ± 0.24% with the immobilized enzyme and 16.61 ± 0.63% with whole cells. The study further demonstrated that all pretreatments primarily targeted the ester linkage, specifically the C = O and C–H bonds. Additionally, the effects of pretreatments were tested on chemical hydrolysis. Due to its inherently caustic nature, chemical hydrolysis did not require any pretreatment. These findings shed light on the interplay of physical and chemical factors influencing biodegradation, offering valuable insights into the importance of pretreatments for the biological hydrolysis of such polymers. Graphical Abstract

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiotechnology for the EnvironmentSame topicMicroplastics and Plastic PollutionFrench-language works237,207