MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407284955 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwae059.066

A66 MICROSCOPIC COLITIS: AN EPIDEMIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF MANITOBA’S POPULATION

2025· article· en· W4407284955 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMicroscopic Colitis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpidemiologyPopulationEnvironmental healthMedicineGeographyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Microscopic colitis (MC) is an inflammatory disease of the colon, causing chronic diarrhea, with 2 histologic sub-types, collagenous colitis and lymphocytic colitis. It tends to affect older individuals, with a female predominance. MC is diagnosed in 10% of patients across all age groups, and in 20% in those over the age of 70 among persons undergoing colonoscopy for chronic watery diarrhea. However, there is a paucity of data in Canadian populations, thus we performed a population-based study in Manitoba to assess the prevalence of MC. Aims Determine of the prevalence of MC in Manitoba from 2006 - 2018. Methods Pathology reports which mentioned MC (or one of the histologic sub-types) were obtained from the Shared Health Pathology Database, which includes a portion of the pathology reports issued in Manitoba for the years 2006 to 2018. These pathology reports were then examined manually to detect true cases of MC. Patient demographics including age, year of diagnosis, and histologic sub-type (collagenous versus lymphocytic) were obtained. Continuous variables were analyzed using means. Results 9377 pathology reports were initially identified. Of these, 916 people (9.8%) were identified with MC, with 74 having had more than 1 colonoscopy during this time period. Of the 916 cases of MC, 53.5% (490) had collagenous colitis, 44.8% (410) had lymphocytic colitis, and 1.7% (16) did not have a specified sub-type reported. There was a female predominance: collagenous colitis at 83.9%, lymphocytic colitis at 77.1%, and unspecified subtype at 81.3%. The mean age of diagnosis for collagenous colitis, lymphocytic colitis, and unspecified, was 62.0 years old (SD 13.2), 59.8 years old (SD 14.6) and 60.5 years ols (SD 15.6,), respectively. The age range of diagnoses was 18 to 91. Of the 70 people who had more than 1 colonoscopy during this time period, 4 people initially had a diagnosis of collagenous colitis which was later switched to lymphocytic colitis, 7 had an initial diagnosis of lymphocytic colitis which was later switched to collagenous colitis, and 1 patient had an initial diagnosis of lymphocytic colitis, then switched to collagenous colitis, and later switched back to lymphocytic colitis. Conclusions In Manitoba over a 13 year time-period, 916 (9.8% of those where MC was considered) were diagnosed from colonic biopsy. Collagenous colitis was more common than lymphocytic colitis, with a similar age at the time of colonoscopy, along with both having a female predominance. Further research is needed to understand whether the clinical courses of collagenous and lymphocytic colitis differ, and how each sub-type responds to conventional treatment. Funding Agencies None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.784
Threshold uncertainty score0.967

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it