MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4407285029 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwae059.108

A108 ASSESSING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MENTAL HEALTH, QUALITY OF LIFE, AND ACCESSING CARE IN PREGNANT IBD PATIENTS

2025· article· en· W4407285029 on OpenAlexaffabout
Velandai Srikanth, V Premjeyanth, S. R. Perera, Katie O’Connor, Н. Ю. Кругляк, Vivian Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Disease Management Strategies
Canadian institutionsSinai Health System
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMental healthQuality (philosophy)MedicineQuality of life (healthcare)Mental health carePsychiatryNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Individuals with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) are at an increased risk of depression and anxiety, which are correlated with IBD disease activity and reduced quality of life. However, the impact of mental health on pregnant persons with IBD and the barriers to mental health care remain less clear. Aims To explore associations between mental health, quality of life, and barriers to addressing mental health concerns in pregnant persons with IBD. Methods We conducted an anonymous, cross-sectional survey of pregnant IBD patients. Data collected included demographics, IBD disease activity via modified Harvey Bradshaw Index (mHBI) for Crohn’s disease (CD) and the Partial Mayo Score 6 (pMayo6) for ulcerative colitis (UC), mental health scores (PHQ-9 and GAD-7), and IBD-related quality of life using the Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (SIBDQ). We also explored patient perceptions of mental health stigma, barriers to accessing care, and comfort in discussing these concerns. Chi-square analysis and Fisher’s Exact Test were employed for categorical comparisons, and the Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare mental health scores with SIBDQ. Results Fifty-seven surveys were analyzed (52.6% CD, 47.4% UC). The mean age was 33.98 years (SD 3.734), and 22.7% had active disease (mHBI ≥ 5 or pMayo6 > 1). Elevated mental health scores (PHQ-9 and/or GAD-7 ≥ 5) were observed in 57.9% of participants, with 7% having high PHQ-9 scores, 12.3% having high GAD-7 scores, and 38.6% having both. The median SIBDQ score was 57 (IQR 12). A significant association was observed between lower SIBDQ scores and the presence of both an elevated PHQ-9 and GAD-7 score (p < 0.001), while neither score alone had a significant effect. 17.5% reported feeling stigmatized when discussing mental health, highlighting concerns of being perceived as weak, some in their role as maternal figures. A statistically significant association was observed between a clinical diagnosis of both depression and anxiety and feeling stigmatized. 12.3% reported cultural deterrents, noting language, negative cultural connotations, and lack of understanding within their communities. Ethnicity, education, and marital status did not significantly affect satisfaction with available supports, experiencing stigma or barriers to access. There was no significant association between Caucasian versus non-Caucasian patients’ preference for discussing these concerns with a physician (GP, IBD specialist, gastroenterologist, OBGYN, psychiatrist) or family/friends. Conclusions Pregnant IBD patients with both elevated PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores may experience diminished quality of life, underscoring the need to address mental health concerns in disease management. Further research is needed to explore the influence of these factors on maternal-neonatal outcomes. Funding Agencies University of Toronto: UT GE-HEP NEW INVESTIGATOR PILOT AWARD

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicChronic Disease Management Strategies→French-language works237,207→