MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407285120 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwae059.067

A67 CASE REPORT: A RARE CASE OF MALAKOPLAKIA

2025· article· en· W4407285120 on OpenAlexaff
Scott Bray, J Myette, A. Stueck, Harrison Petropolis

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfectious Disease Case Reports and Treatments
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMalakoplakiaMalacoplakiaMedicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Malakoplakia is a rare chronic granulomatous inflammatory condition first described in the literature in 19021. It is thought to be a result of impaired macrophages ability to completely digest and kill bacteria, resulting in phagocytosed bacteria accumulating in macrophages calcifying overtime. Malakoplakia can affect all organs of the body and is four-times more likely to affect females2. It most commonly occurs within the genitourinary tract with the gastrointestinal tract being the second most common site. Aims The literature regarding malakoplakia of the rectum is limited and rare3. Methods This 39-year-old immunosuppressed male with a history of three renal transplants receiving tacrolimus and chronic prednisone found to have rectal malakoplakia. He was referred to gastroenterology for symptoms of constipation and iron deficiency anemia. A colonoscopy was completed which demonstrated 4-rectal polyps, each at an estimated size of 5 mm which were removed by cold snare. Results The rectal polyps were sent for histological analysis and demonstrated expansion of cells into the lamina propria. Cells were mostly epithelioid histiocytes with some admixed neutrophils, lymphocytes, and plasma cells, but infiltration did not destroy the mucosal architecture or crypts. Some of the histiocytes contain pale, round intracytoplasmic structures with concentric layering, consistent with Michaelis-Gutmann bodies. CD68 confirmed infiltrating cells were macrophages, confirming a diagnosis of rectal malakoplakia (Figure 1). Conclusions He was seen in follow-up in Gastroenterology clinic and his symptoms of constipation, did not appear to be contributory towards this incidental finding of malakoplakia. Furthermore, infectious disease was involved in this patient’s care for consideration of antimicrobial therapy, but a decision was made to treat conservatively and monitor for any new gastrointestinal symptoms. This patient is followed by gastroenterology and booked for repeat colonoscopy in 6-months for follow-up to determine if these lesions can be eradicated through polypectomy. 1. Liu, Xiangyu, et al. “Rectal malakoplakia mimicking advanced rectal cancer: A case report.” Heliyon 9.10 (2023). 2. Wang, Zhenting, and Jiannan Ren. “Clinical analysis of renal failure caused by malakoplakia: a case report and literature review.” Frontiers in Medicine 9 (2022): 770731. 3. Achufusi, T. G., Jessamy, K., Chebaya, P., & Rawlins, S. (2020). Rectal malakoplakia. Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center), 33(3), 389–390. Funding Agencies:

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.536
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicInfectious Disease Case Reports and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207