MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407285656 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwae059.188

A188 NATURAL HISTORY OF PERIANAL FISTULAS IN PATIENTS WITH ILEAL POUCH ANAL ANASTOMOSIS

2025· article· en· W4407285656 on OpenAlexaff
Mary Raina Angeli Fujiyoshi, J McCurdy

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAnorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPouchNatural historyMedicineAnastomosisSurgeryGeneral surgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The natural history of perianal fistulas (PAF) in patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) remains poorly understood. Perianal fistulas can significantly impact the quality of life and clinical outcomes in patients who have undergone IPAA. To date, there is limited data available on the long-term progression, treatment responses, and overall outcomes of PAF in this unique patient population. Aims The primary aim of this study is to report the clinical outcomes of PAF in patients with IPAA. Methods We performed a retrospective, observation cohort study between 2000 and 2024. We included adults (>17 years) with an IPAA who developed a perianal fistula and a minimum of 1 year follow-up after PAF diagnosis. PAF disease activity was categorized on an annual basis according to the following disease activity patterns: remission, minimally active, relapsing-remitting, and chronic persistent. We also determined medication utilization, medication effectiveness and major adverse fistula outcomes (MAFO): a composite of hospitalization, surgical drainage of PAF and fecal diversion. Results A total of 29 patients with an IPAA and PAF were identified: mean (SD) age 49.3 (13.2); 19 (65.5%) female, and 17 (63.0%) with complex fistulas radiologically at the time of diagnosis. After a mean (SD) follow-up of 9.7 years (7.4), 7 (25.0%) patients required fecal diversion, and 2 (7.1%) patients underwent pouch excision. Annual PAF disease patterns are reported in Figure 1. At the last date of follow-up, 26 (92.9%) patients achieved fistula remission. A total of 16 (55.2%) patients underwent treatment with an advanced therapy: 14 (87.5%) anti-TNF and 2 (12.5%) Risankizumab. After initiating a first advanced therapy, 10 (62.5%) patients achieved fistula remission at 12 months. Furthermore, 3 (18.8%) patients developed a MAFO after initiating their first advanced therapy: 3 (18.8%) underwent surgical drainage, 1 (6.3%) was hospitalized, and 1 (6.3%) underwent fecal diversion for PAF. Conclusions This study demonstrated that the majority of patients with PAF in the setting of IPAA achieved fistula remission clinically, particularly after treatment with advanced therapies. Despite the high remission rates, a substantial subset of patients still required fecal diversion and pouch excision. Annual perianal fistula disease patterns Funding Agencies None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicAnorectal Disease Treatments and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207