MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407285727 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwae059.215

A215 INJECTION SITE PAIN AND ADHERENCE IN PATIENTS SWITCHING FROM REFERENCE ADALIMUMAB TO AVT02 – INTERIM RESULTS OF THE EASE PAIN TRIAL.

2025· article· en· W4407285727 on OpenAlexaffabout
Dara K. Shahrokh, Waqqas Afif, A. Hillary Steinhart, Naureen Narula

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPharmaceutical studies and practices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoMcMaster Children's HospitalMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterimAdalimumabMedicineExtended releaseInterim analysisPhysical therapyClinical trialInternal medicinePharmacologyHistoryRheumatoid arthritis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background AVT02, a biosimilar to reference product (RP) adalimumab, was first approved in Canada in 2022. AVT02 is formulated at high concentration and with citrate-free excipients. The EASE PAIN trial is a Phase IV study in Canada evaluating the impact of switching from RP, or an alternative adalimumab biosimilar, to AVT02. Aims The primary objective was to examine the impact of switching on injection site pain across patients in Canada. Secondary objectives included describing the impact of switching on injection site reaction including burning sensation and soreness, treatment adherence, and patient-reported quality of life. Methods The study enrolled patients with gastrointestinal conditions (Crohn’s disease [CD], ulcerative colitis [UC]), rheumatological conditions (rheumatoid arthritis [RA], ankylosing spondylitis [AS], psoriatic arthritis [PsA]), or dermatological conditions (hidradenitis suppurativa [HS], psoriasis [PsO]). Participants were eligible if their treating physician had decided to switch them from low-concentration RP or alternative adalimumab biosimilar to AVT02. The study assesses injection site pain measured via Visual Analog Scale (VAS), adherence, and quality of life (based on EQ-5D-5L) for participants up to Day 180 after switching. The study is currently ongoing (331 Patients enrolled in the Study; 287 included in the interim analysis) Results The intention-to-treat (ITT) population comprised 287 participants. Following the first administration of AVT02, injection site VAS pain score decreased by an average of -18.8 ± 25.51 across the whole population. Supporting this, there was reduction in overall injection site reactions (49.1%), burning sensation (79.4%), and soreness (84.8%) between baseline (RP administration) and follow-up (AVT02 administration). Adherence rate was 95.5% overall. The ITT population maintained high quality of life score (EQ-5D-5L score of >81 on a scale of 1-100) after switching from RP to AVT02. Conclusions The results of this study demonstrate that switching from RP or alternative biosimilar adalimumab to AVT02 leads to decreased injection site pain across all indications, and maintenance of high adherence rates and high quality of life among patients. Funding Agencies None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicPharmaceutical studies and practicesFrench-language works237,207