MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4407285730 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwae059.200

A200 A POPULATION-BASED ASSESSMENT OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY AND EXERCISE IN PERSONS WITH IBD

2025· article· en· W4407285730 on OpenAlexaffabout
Casandra Dolovich, Sydney Chochinov, Garipe Ly, Adebanke Oketola, Samuel Narvey, Sydney Larance, Maitreyi Raman, Sandra C. Webber, Çharles N. Bernstein

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Management and Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysical activityPhysical therapyMedicinePopulationEnvironmental healthGerontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background It is known that physical activity (PA)/exercise is associated with a reduced risk in chronic disease. However, less is known about its impact on inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) specifically. Research generally uses the terms ‘PA’ and ‘exercise’ interchangeably, which although similar, are overlapping classifications of activity. As a result, interpreting and comparing existing findings can be challenging. Aims We aimed to assess the physical activity and exercise profiles of persons with IBD, their limitations in undertaking PA/exercise, and how PA correlates with active disease and fatigue in a population-based sample in Manitoba, Canada. Methods A cross-sectional survey study was undertaken by participants in the University of Manitoba IBD Research Registry. The survey included sociodemographic factors, PA/exercise, the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), Inflammatory Bowel Disease Symptom Inventory (IBDSI), and Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS). Bivariate and logistic regression analyses were used to assess the association between PA and disease activity and fatigue. Results The survey was completed by 1257 of 2740 invitees (45.8%). The mean age of participants was 60.8 +/- 13.0 years. The most common type of PA and exercise that respondents participated in were walking for leisure/exercise (84%) and the most common type of PA and exercise avoided was running/jogging (16%). Physically active status per IPAQ was categorized as inactive-low in 42.5%, moderately active in 32.0%, and highly active in 25.5%. Average fatigue levels were mean 24.9 SD 18.9 per MFIS. PA and fatigue levels were similar for those >55 vs those <55 years. For ulcerative colitis (UC) persons, after adjusting for demographic and clinical factors, the odds of lower levels of PA were greater among females [aOR 95% CI, 1.76 (1.12-2.78)], ever smoked [aOR 95% CI, 2.55 (1.11-5.73)], active disease (per IBDS) [aOR 95% CI, 1.68 (1.07-2.62)], and with an increase in MFIS total score [aOR 95% CI, 1.02 (1.01-1.04)]. Conclusions There was a high rate of inactive to low PA among persons with IBD. Females with UC especially need to be encouraged to increase their PA. While it is not surprising that persons with active disease may have reduced or even avoided PA, this requires further study. Since as a result, PA may reduce deconditioning that may accompany periods of active disease and increased fatigue. These findings underscore the need for tailored PA/exercise guidelines for individuals with IBD. Future research should explore objective measures of PA to better understand PA/exercise in both younger and older adult populations. Funding Agencies CAG, None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.335
Threshold uncertainty score0.667

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicDiabetes Management and Research→French-language works237,207→