MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4407285824 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwae059.158

A158 APPLYING MACHINE LEARNING FOR PREDICTING TREATMENT RESPONSE TO VEDOLIZUMAB IN PEDIATRIC IBD BY SERUM METABOLOMICS

2025· article· en· W4407285824 on OpenAlexafffund
R G Suarez Suarez, Omer Or, Gili Focht, Z Shavit, Esther Orlanski‐Meyer, Efrat Broide, Darja Urlep, Jeffrey S. Hyams, Jeremiah Levine, Joel R. Rosh, Dan Turner, Eytan Wine

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Management and Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCentre hospitalier universitaire Sainte-JustineHospital for Sick ChildrenMax Rady College of Medicine, University of ManitobaUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of TorontoMcMaster UniversityHebrew University of JerusalemUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsVedolizumabMetabolomicsMedicineMachine learningComputer scienceInternal medicineBioinformaticsDiseaseInflammatory bowel diseaseBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Vedolizumab (VDZ) is effective to induce remission in children with Crohn disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), but effectiveness varies. Metabolites produced by interactions between intestinal microbiota and host metabolic processes can be useful to identify metabolome signatures that may preferentially favor response to a specific therapeutic class. Therefore, metabolomic studies can potentially inform precision medicine in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD). Aims This study aimed to apply machine learning to assess metabolites as potential predictors for forecasting the response to VDZ treatment. Methods VedoKids is a multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study, designed to report the effectiveness and safety of VDZ. Children aged 0-18 years, diagnosed with IBD, who initiated VDZ treatment at any stage of their condition, were subjected to comprehensive assessments at the onset and subsequently at 2, 6, 14, 30, 54 weeks and thereafter. Detailed demographic, clinical, and safety information was meticulously recorded in a prospective manner throughout the study period. Metabolomic profiling was conducted in serum at three time points: baseline, 14 weeks, and 30 weeks. Metabolites were identified using a quantitative metabolomics approach utilizing DI/LC-MS/MS technology for the analysis of serum samples. We constructed a learning algorithm to predict treatment response to identify the most relevant serum metabolites subset. The algorithm consisted of a Random Fores (RF) model and maximum relevance minimum redundancy (mRMR) feature selection. Response was defined as decrease of ≥20 points in PUCAI or >20 points in wPCDAI and clinical remission as PUCAI<10 or wPCDAI<12.5. Results We were able to train different RF models using clinical, pre-treatment, and serum metabolite data. Results for the experiment performed with CD patients at week 14 shows an AUC = 0.95 with N-Acetyl-Aspartic acid, Fumaric acid, and Glutamine scoring among the features with highest predictive importance. Results for the experiment performed with UC patients at week 30 shows an AUC = 0.81 with Isoleucine, Malic acid, and N-Acetyl-Glutamic acid scoring among the features with highest predictive importance. Conclusions Our results suggest that it is possible to produce predictor capable of predicting response to VDZ treatment using clinical and metabolome data in children with IBD. Importantly, some of the identified metabolites have been previously associated with IBD pathophysiology. Funding Agencies CIHR

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicDiabetes Management and Research→French-language works237,207→