MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407285863 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwae059.129

A129 CLINICAL RELIABILITY OF LOWERED ANTI-TISSUE TRANSGLUTAMINASE LEVEL FOR SEROLOGIC DIAGNOSIS OF PEDIATRIC CELIAC DISEASE

2025· article· en· W4407285863 on OpenAlexaffabout
A. Lang, Michelle Wiepjes, Mahboobeh Zarrabi, Daniela Migliarese Isaac, Joanne Turner

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCeliac Disease Research and Management
Canadian institutionsAlberta Health ServicesDalhousie UniversityUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTissue transglutaminaseSerologyDiseaseMedicineReliability (semiconductor)ImmunologyPathologyDermatologyAntibodyBiologyBiochemistryEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The most recent North American pediatric gastroenterology guidelines on diagnosing celiac disease (CD) published in 2016 recommend endoscopic diagnosis (ED) with histologic evaluation as the gold standard in all patients. This contrasts with European guidelines, which have advocated for a serologic diagnosis (SD) in eligible patients, since 2012. The Stollery Children’s Hospital (Edmonton, Alberta), has incorporated SD following internal validation since 2016. Until 2020, SD used an anti-tissue transglutaminase (aTTG) >200 IU/mL with confirmatory HLA typing. After 2020, SD used aTTG >10x the upper limit of normal (ULN) on 2 separate blood-draws. Aims The aim of this study was to determine the clinical reliability of a lowered threshold of aTTg >5x ULN for SD in our centre. A secondary aim was to determine estimated healthcare cost savings if this change were implemented. Methods We completed a retrospective chart review on pediatric patients (<18 years) diagnosed with CD at our centre from 2018-2021. Patients who underwent endoscopy for suspected CD were included. The costing method was a mix of aggregate costing for endoscopy performed in ambulatory care of the hospital plus micro-costing of other service utilizations such as physician fee for endoscopy, anesthesiologist fee, lab test and processing fees. To calculate the estimated cost savings, we subtracted the estimated costs of diagnosis in our population when all those meeting SD avoided endoscopy from the estimated total cost of diagnosis if these patients had all undergone ED. Results In total, 507 patients underwent endoscopy (Figure 1). In patients with aTTG >10x ULN, specificity for CD diagnosis was 99.2% with positive predictive value (PPV) 98.5%. In patients with aTTG >5x ULN, specificity remained 99.2% with PPV 99.5%. There was one false positive case (aTTG 104 IU/L, negative biopsies). In our study population, use of lowered SD threshold from 2020-2021 would lead to 34 (10.8%) fewer endoscopies, with associated healthcare cost savings of an estimated $88,919 (Table 1). Conclusions In our centre, a lower cut-off value for SD may improve time to diagnosis and initiation of a gluten-free diet, and is cost saving. Preliminary results show comparable performance to the currently accepted diagnostic approach used at our centre. Future directions include validating these findings with a larger sample size, as well as determining acceptance of this diagnostic method by patients and families, given the rare but real potential for false positive diagnoses. Estimated Cost Savings of ED vs SD *Average cost of ED= $2642.13, Estimated cost of SD = $26.86 Funding Agencies None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicCeliac Disease Research and ManagementFrench-language works237,207