MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407286482 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwae059.250

A250 ESOPHAGOGASTRIC JUNCTION OUTFLOW OBSTRUCTION SECONDARY TO METASTATIC SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA A CASE REPORT AND REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE

2025· article· en· W4407286482 on OpenAlexaff
Zaki Alhashimalsayed, K McIntosh

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEsophagogastric junctionBasal cellOutflowMedicineOncologyInternal medicineAdenocarcinomaCancerGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO) is a condition characterized by impaired relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter, with intact peristalsis. The Chicago Classification version 4.0 (CCv4.0) updated the diagnostic criteria to include not only elevated integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) but also dysphagia, high intrabolus pressure, and abnormal findings on timed barium esophagram or FLIP. EGJOO can be caused by secondary factors such as structural issues, medications, inflammatory conditions, or cancer, with rare cases linked to metastatic disease, like SCC of the skin. Identifying metastatic cancer as a potential cause in motility disorders requires careful evaluation in unusual cases Aims A 63-year-old man with a two-month history of dysphagia, 20-pound weight loss, chest pressure, and regurgitation did not respond to PPIs. His medical history included type 2 diabetes, two renal transplants, and a past cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) treated with surgery and radiotherapy. He was on long-term immunosuppressive therapy. Endoscopy showed a tightly constricted LES, and HRM confirmed EGJOO with impaired LES relaxation. CT imaging revealed an 8 cm mass at the gastroesophageal junction and a 4 cm lung lesion. Biopsy confirmed metastatic SCC, indicating recurrence. This case emphasizes the need to consider malignancy in EGJOO, especially in patients with cancer history and immunosuppression Methods N Results EGJOO secondary to metastatic SCC is rare but important to recognize. Diagnostic criteria in CCv4.0 help reduce false positives by incorporating symptoms and confirmatory tests, differentiating clinically significant EGJOO from incidental findings. It is crucial to systematically evaluate for secondary causes, particularly malignancy, though routine imaging may not provide additional benefits over endoscopy and timed barium esophagram unless there is a strong suspicion This case highlights how a history of SCC and long-term immunosuppression can contribute to metastasis to the GEJ. Management primarily focuses on palliative care to relieve dysphagia and enhance quality of life, using endoscopic, pharmacological, or radiotherapy options, while more invasive treatments like POEM or pneumatic dilation may be less appropriate for cancer patients Conclusions This case report highlights a rare cause of EGJOO secondary to metastatic SCC, emphasizing the need for thorough evaluation in dysphagia cases. Findings suggest that cancer should be considered in EGJOO patients with known cancer histories or immunosuppression. Early recognition and palliative management can significantly enhance the patient’s quality of life by effectively addressing dysphagia. This report contributes to the understanding of EGJOO as a heterogeneous condition with various underlying pathologies, including metastatic cancer Funding Agencies None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0070.006
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicCancer Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207