MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407301815 · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42601

The Cardiff Eye Shape Analysis Protocol (CESAP): Producing a digital representation of the anterior ocular surface

2025· article· en· W4407301815 on OpenAlexaff
Jennifer M. Turner, Chi Hieu Le, Paul J. Murphy

Bibliographic record

VenueHeliyon · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicOcular Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersCardiff University
KeywordsRepresentation (politics)OptometryProtocol (science)Surface (topology)OphthalmologyComputer scienceComputer graphics (images)Artificial intelligenceMedicineMathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: To develop a method for accurate 3-dimensional (3D) representation of the anterior ocular surface (AOS) based on ocular impression and reverse engineering of an AOS plaster biomodel. Methods: An AOS plaster biomodel was fabricated using ocular impression and a developed casting support device (CSD) and landmark registration element (LRE) to stabilise and consistently fix the impression casting tray within the casting support during the casting process. The touch-trigger probe on a co-ordinate measurement machine (CMM) digitised the AOS plaster biomodel to represent the AOS shape. The CSD and LRE were manufactured using an Additive Manufacturing selective laser sintering (SLS) process. A single stainless-steel ball (diameter: 22 mm) was cast as a surrogate AOS biomodel using polyvinylsiloxane impression material. The surrogate biomodel which was used to evaluate material selection and stability of the AOS biomodels fabricated using the CSD and LRE, and to evaluate repeatability and reproducibility of the point cloud data collection methods. The points of circular profiles were measured at different Z values in mm: z = -1 mm, z = -2 mm, z = - 3 mm, z = -4 mm and z = -5 mm. Results: The measurements were highly repeatable with an acceptable tolerance. For the typical case of the surrogate AOS biomodel, the average distance of the digitised points to the best-fit sphere of all the digitised points from four measurements ranges from 0.002 to 0.010 mm. The shrinkage study of the surrogate AOS biomodels was conducted, with measurements taken one month apart for comparison. The analysis results showed that most of the surrogate AOS biomodels reduced in size but within an acceptable tolerance, in which the mean error is from 0.005 to 0.010 mm for the 2D circular profiles measured at Z = -4 mm. Conclusions: The Cardiff Eye Shape Analysis Protocol (CESAP) provides a repeatable and consistent method for producing solid, white-plaster, representations of a plaster cast AOS biomodel. Casting an impression in white plaster (Novadur™) produces a consistent surrogate AOS biomodel of a single stainless-steel 22 mm diameter ball. CESAP can be used as a framework for consistently converting an ocular impression into a 'real' AOS model that can be reverse-engineered to create 3D CAD models of the AOS shape for potential applications in optical image (topographer) calibration, prosthetic shell and scleral lens design, and AOS database development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.447
Threshold uncertainty score0.229

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHeliyonSame topicOcular Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207