Why Are Young Children Not in Child Care? Typologies of Child Care Non-Use among Canadian Children under Six Years
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'article examine la non-utilisation de services de garde d'enfants avant les accords pancanadiens sur l'apprentissage et la garde de jeunes enfants intervenus entre le gouvernement fédéral et les gouvernements provinciaux et territoriaux et appuyés par un investissement fédéral de jusqu’à 30 milliards de dollars canadiens. À l'aide de données de l'Enquête sur les modes d'apprentissage et de garde des jeunes enfants de Statistique Canada recueillies en 2019 (avant la pandémie) et en 2020 (en cours de pandémie), l'auteure a mené des analyses de structure latente pour les raisons parentales de ne pas utiliser de services de garde et a cerné six typologies similaires de non-utilisation de services de garde pour les deux cohortes, plus une typologie de parents ayant à composer avec une pandémie en 2020. Certains parents ne semblaient pas désirer se prévaloir de services de garde (p. ex., parents choisissant de rester à la maison, parents accommodés par l’école, parents en congé du travail, parents au chômage). D'autres ont semblé ne pas avoir été en mesure de satisfaire leurs besoins en matière de services de garde, en raison d'obstacles liés aux frais des services ou de contraintes liées à la pandémie. L'auteure estime que la demande non satisfaite était équivalente à 201 858 enfants de moins de 6 ans (9 %) en 2019 et à 394 881 enfants (17 %) en 2020.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Direct model labels (unvalidated)
Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.
| Model arm | Categories | Study design | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemma | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: yes | Observational | low |
| gpt | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: yes | Observational | low |
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedLabeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".