Linking acoustic telemetry data to spatial covariates in river networks with spatially explicit capture-recapture models
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Spatially explicit capture-recapture (SECR) models extend classical capture-recapture models to include spatially-explicit animal locations and environmental covariates. SECR models have been widely employed in terrestrial studies to predict the population size and densities of animals assuming a closed population over a defined area. In this work, we extend and apply SECR models to a novel use-case that both uses a relative density formulation and accounts for biased tagging distributions to estimate parameters of habitat use from acoustic telemetry data in a branching river network. Using SECR models, we predict how temperature distributions during the summer feeding season influenced how tagged Arctic grayling ( Thymallus arcticus ) distributed themselves through the Parsnip watershed in northcentral British Columbia, Canada. We found that the relative density of tagged Arctic grayling peaked at water temperatures of 12.4 °C. In warm years, relative densities were constricted as parts of the watershed became unfavorably warm. In cool years, fish were distributed widely throughout the watershed. In acoustic telemetry, only the tagged population is available for detection. We highlight several specific considerations and assumptions for using this approach: i.e. (a) activity centres are assumed to remain in the same location throughout the study period, thus the time window of the study should be selected accordingly (e.g., exclude migratory periods); (b) inferences from acoustic telemetry data depict relative (not absolute) densities; and (c) spatial tagging effort must be defined in the model to ensure that predictions are not merely an artefact of tagging effort across space and time. When applied following these assumptions, this method is broadly useful for ecologists as it presents a quantitative way to merge automated telemetry datasets with discrete habitat parameters that drive population distributions through time and are relevant to managers and conservation professionals. Further, this method can be applied to branching river networks in which topological challenges have hindered other statistical approaches.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".