MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407338784 · doi:10.1021/acsomega.4c09421

Structural Basis for the Improved RNA Clamping of Amidino-Rocaglates to eIF4A1

2025· article· en· W4407338784 on OpenAlexaff
James F. Conley, Lauren E. Brown, James McNeely, Jerry Pelletier, John A. Porco, Karen N. Allen

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Omega · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant biochemistry and biosynthesis
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNational Institute of General Medical SciencesOffice of ScienceNational Institutes of HealthNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsClampingBasis (linear algebra)Computer scienceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Eukaryotic initiation factor 4A-1 (eIF4A1) is an ATP-dependent RNA helicase that unwinds 5′-UTR mRNA secondary structures to facilitate cap-dependent translation initiation. Rocaglates, a class of natural products typified by rocaglamide A (RocA), possess antineoplastic and anti-infectious activity mediated by their interaction with eIF4A1. Rocaglates inhibit cap-dependent translation initiation by “clamping” eIF4A1 onto polypurine RNA, which impedes ribosome scanning. A novel class of rocaglate derivatives, amidino-rocaglates (ADRs) which feature an amidine ring fused to the rocaglate core, is particularly effective at promoting eIF4A1–RNA-clamping compared to other rocaglate congeners. Herein, we present the X-ray crystal structure of an ADR in complex with eIF4A1, the nonhydrolyzable ATP ground-state mimic adenylyl-imidodiphosphate (AMPPNP), and poly r(AG) 5 RNA refined to 1.69 Å resolution. The binding pose and interactions of the ADR with eIF4A1 do not differ substantially from those of RocA, prompting an investigation of the basis for enhanced target engagement. Computational modeling suggests that the rigidified ADR scaffold is inherently preorganized in an eIF4A1–RNA binding-competent conformation, thereby avoiding entropic penalties associated with RocA binding. This study illustrates how conformational rigidification of the rocaglate scaffold can be leveraged to improve potency for the development of rocaglates as potential anticancer and anti-infectious agents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.360

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS OmegaSame topicPlant biochemistry and biosynthesisFrench-language works237,207