MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407346470 · doi:10.1177/19160216251318256

Resource Utilization and Cost Analysis of Pediatric Esophageal Foreign Bodies

2025· article· en· W4407346470 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Tanya Chen, Jennifer M. Siu, Yasmine Madan, Gar‐Way Ma, Peter J. Gill, Nicholas Carman, Evan J. Propst, Nikolaus E. Wolter

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicForeign Body Medical Cases
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
FundersHospital for Sick Children
KeywordsMedicineTertiary careOdds ratioCost analysisConfidence intervalComplicationOtorhinolaryngologyEmergency medicineSurgeryOperations researchMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective Impacted esophageal foreign bodies (EFBs) are a common but preventable presentation in children, requiring prompt removal in the operating room by esophagoscopy. Our objective was to describe the overall cost of impacted pediatric EFBs and determine factors that increase resource burden. Methods A cost analysis of pediatric patients undergoing esophagoscopy for EFB removal from 2010 to 2021 was performed. Characteristics of each EFB, patient transfer, and hospital course were collected. Direct and indirect healthcare costs were calculated using hospital-specific costs and provincial fees. Amounts were calculated in Canadian dollars. Results Six hundred and eighty patients were included. The total amount spent on pediatric EFBs from 2010 to 2021 was $2,673,288. The mean total cost per child with an EFB was $3469. An extra hour of delay before Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery (OHNS) consultation at a tertiary hospital corresponded to an $816 cost [95% confidence interval (CI; 244.7–1287.4)]. On average, children requiring transfer to a tertiary care center cost $1965 more than those initially presenting to a tertiary care center ( P = .001). Higher-risk EFBs (n = 165, 24%) were associated with a longer hospital stay and greater complication rate and resulted in a $4095 increase in overall cost compared to lower-risk EFBs [$6829 (standard deviation (SD) $11,347) vs $2734 (SD $10,451), P = .02]. Button battery ingestions cost 8.8 times more than non-dangerous EFBs, such as coins. Longer distance for transfer was associated with a higher likelihood of having complications [odds ratios (OR) 1.5, 95% CI (1.1–1.8)]. Conclusion EFBs pose a significant economic burden to the healthcare system, driven by transfer to a tertiary care center, delays in transfer to the operating room, and high-risk EFBs. It is critical to identify areas for improved efficiency such as increased parental education for primary prevention, early involvement of the OHNS team and improving the capacity of community hospitals to manage EFB to limit transfers when possible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.419

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck SurgerySame topicForeign Body Medical CasesFrench-language works237,207