MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407349166 · doi:10.1002/mds.30141

Classification and Genotype–Phenotype Relationships of <scp><i>GBA1</i></scp> Variants: <scp>MDSGene</scp> Systematic Review

2025· review· en· W4407349166 on OpenAlexafffund
Malco Rossi, Susen Schaake, Tatiana Usnich, Johann Boehm, Nathalie Schell, Tuğçe Gül-Demirkale, Natascha Bahr, Teresa Kleinz, Harutyun Madoev, Björn‐Hergen Laabs, Ziv Gan‐Or, Roy N. Alcalay, Katja Lohmann, Christine Klein

Bibliographic record

VenueMovement Disorders · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLysosomal Storage Disorders Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersNational Institutes of HealthFleniH. Lundbeck A/SParkinson CanadaUniversität zu LübeckServierLundbeckfondenDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftJazz PharmaceuticalsUniversity of OxfordParkinson's FoundationElse Kröner-Fresenius-StiftungUniversität BielefeldMcGill UniversityIdorsia PharmaceuticalsUniversity of TorontoBiogenKoç Üniversitesi Translasyonel Tıp Araştırma MerkeziSanofiMichael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research
KeywordsParkinsonismGenotypeDiseasePenetranceEthnic groupMedicineDementiaGeneticsPhenotypeInternal medicineBiologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Depending on zygosity and the specific change, different variants in the GBA1 gene can cause Parkinson's disease (PD, PARK-GBA1) with reduced penetrance, act as genetic risk factors for PD or parkinsonism, and/or lead to Gaucher's disease (GD). This MDSGene systematic literature review covers 27,963 patients carrying GBA1 variants from 1082 publications with 794 variants, including 13,342 patients with PD or other forms of parkinsonism. It provides a comprehensive overview of demographic, clinical, and genetic findings from an ethnically diverse sample originating from 82 countries across five continents. The most frequent pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants were "N409S" (aka "N370S"; dominating among Jewish and Whites), and "L483P" (aka "L444P"; dominating among Asians and Hispanics), whereas the most common coding risk variants were "E365K" (E326K), and "T408M" (T369M) (both common among Whites). A novel finding is that early-onset PD patients were predominantly of Asian ethnicity, whereas late-onset PD patients were mainly of White ethnicity. Motor cardinal features were similar between PD patients and other forms of parkinsonism, whereas motor complications and non-motor symptoms were more frequently reported in PD patients carrying "severe" variants than in those with "risk" or "mild" variants. Cognitive decline was reported in most patients after surgical treatment, despite achieving a beneficial motor function response. Most GD patients developing PD harbored the "N409S" variant, were of Ashkenazi Jewish ethnicity, and showed a positive response to chronic levodopa treatment. With this review, we start to fill the gaps regarding genotype-phenotype correlations in GBA1 variant carriers, especially concerning PD. © 2025 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.007
Bibliometrics0.0100.011
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMovement DisordersSame topicLysosomal Storage Disorders ResearchFrench-language works237,207