MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407364592 · doi:10.1016/j.wdp.2025.100666

Ice roads and income in remote indigenous communities of Canada

2025· article· en· W4407364592 on OpenAlexaffabout
Fatma Ahmed

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Development Perspectives · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArctic and Russian Policy Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousGeographyEconomic geographyPolitical scienceEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Rising temperatures threaten ice road viability, shortening operational seasons and destabilizing economic activities critical to the NWT’s remote Indigenous communities. • Extended ice road seasons improve incomes in remote NWT communities, particularly benefiting economies with diversified structures. Ice road deviations disproportionately harm low-income communities reliant on resource extraction and subsistence practices, exacerbating price inflation for essentials. • Formal education negatively impacts low-income NWT families due to misalignment with traditional livelihoods and local labor markets, contrasting with its positive effects in high-income, diversified economies. • Social programs effectively support low-income households but may crowd out income-generation incentives in higher-income groups, reflecting regional inequities in economic opportunities. • Sustainable development requires culturally relevant education, targeted social policies, and climate-resilient infrastructure to address systemic inequities and ensure inclusive growth. I estimate the effects of ice road length deviation on the level of income in the Northwest Territories communities. The harsh weather conditions and extreme climates in the NWT magnify the challenges associated with maintaining infrastructure, often undermining its long-term benefits. I find that the disruptions in ice roads, which serve as vital links for northern Canadian communities, exacerbate income inequality by placing a greater burden on low-income households while disproportionately favoring higher-income groups. Education is a critical factor in driving income growth and reducing inequality. Conversely, reliance on social assistance notably reduces income for higher-income families, while it provides a boost for those in need. Larger communities, however, experience more severe economic challenges, especially within lower-income groups.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.465
Threshold uncertainty score0.510

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Development PerspectivesSame topicArctic and Russian Policy StudiesFrench-language works237,207