Dysfunction in the hierarchy of morphometric similarity network in Alzheimer’s disease and its correlation with cognitive performance and gene expression profiles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous research has shown abnormal functional network gradients in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Structural network gradient is capable of capturing continuous changes in brain morphology and has the ability to elucidate the underlying processes of neurodevelopment. However, it remains unclear whether structural network gradients are altered in AD and what associations exist between these changes and cognitive function, and gene expression profiles. METHODS: By constructing an individualized structural network gradient decomposition framework, we calculated the morphological similarity network (MSN) gradients for 404 subjects (186 AD patients and 218 normal controls). We investigated AD-related alterations in MSN gradients, along with the associations between MSN gradients and cognitive function, MSN topological properties, and gene expression profiles. RESULTS: Our findings indicated that the principal MSN gradient alterations in AD were primarily characterized by an increase in the primary and secondary sensory cortices and a decrease in the association cortex 1. The primary and higher-order cortices exhibited opposite associations with cognition, including executive function, language skills, and memory processes. Moreover, the principal MSN gradients were found to significantly predict cognitive function in AD. The altered gradient pattern was 14.8% attributable to gene expression profiles, and the genes demonstrating the highest correlation are involved in metabolic activity and synaptic signaling. CONCLUSIONS: Our results offered novel insights into the underlying mechanisms of structural brain network impairment in AD patients, enhancing our understanding of the neurobiological processes responsible for impaired cognition in patients with AD, and offering a new dimensional structural biomarker for AD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".