MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407382075 · doi:10.1016/j.ijscr.2025.111044

Pediatric intraarticular ganglion cyst with extraarticular extension in the knee: A case report

2025· article· en· W4407382075 on OpenAlexaff
Abdulmajeed Alwayil, Raheef Alatassi, Aiman Alshomrani, Khalid Beidas

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Surgery Case Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMusculoskeletal synovial abnormalities and treatments
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGanglion cystSurgeryCystGanglionAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: In total, there are fewer than ten reported cases of intraarticular ganglion cysts in the pediatric population. Herein, we report a rare case of intraarticular ganglion cyst inside the knee with extraarticular extension in a 5-year-old child. CASE PRESENTATION: A 5-year-old boy presented with an anterior knee mass associated with limping, and limited range of motion in the right knee for 1 year. Surgical excision with arthroscopy was performed to treat the intraarticular ganglion cyst with extraarticular extension. At follow-up, the mass had completely detached, and the patient had full range of motion without complaints or recurrence. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Ganglion cysts are benign lesions, and are extremely rare in pediatric age groups with fewer than ten cases reported in the literature. We report this case as the first infrapatellar fat pad ganglion cyst with anterolateral extraarticular extension via the lateral reticulum, compared to previous reported cases, which were pure intraarticular cysts the majority of which had an ACL origin. CONCLUSION: The clinical manifestation of a rare ganglion cyst in the knee is variable. Magnetic resonance imaging is the cornerstone of diagnosis. Treatment varies according to the cyst location, and requires analysis of the mass, meticulous preoperative planning, and experienced surgeons.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.088
Threshold uncertainty score0.380

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Surgery Case ReportsSame topicMusculoskeletal synovial abnormalities and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207