Hyaluronic Acid Rectal Spacer for Rectal Protection in Salvage Cystoprostatectomy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: In salvage cystoprostatectomies (SCPs), rectal injuries can occur at a rate of 1% to 10%. Factors including T3 disease and prior pelvic radiation can lead to complications such as bleeding, recurrent wound infections and the need for colonic diversion. Methods: We present a male patient in his late 70s with a new diagnosis of pT2 muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). This is on a background of Stage IIB prostate cancer 10 years ago, managed with external beam radiotherapy. He patient had hyaluronic acid (HA) rectal spacer infiltration into the Denonvilliers’ space two weeks prior, for rectal protection. HA rectal spacers are easily identifiable due to their anechoic appearance on ultrasound imaging, making them easily distinguishable when injected into the Denonvilliers’ space intraoperatively. Results: The patient did not experience any symptoms related to rectal injury and had full bowel continence postoperatively. Conclusion: Although approved for use in radiation treatment for prostate cancer, their role in aiding dissection during SCP remains unexplored. We exhibit the use of HA rectal spacers for rectal protection during SCP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".