In vivo expansion of gene-targeted hepatocytes through transient inhibition of an essential gene
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Homology-directed repair (HDR)–based genome editing is an approach that could permanently correct a broad range of genetic diseases. However, its utility is limited by inefficient and imprecise DNA repair mechanisms in terminally differentiated tissues. Here, we tested Repair Drive, a platform technology for selectively expanding HDR-corrected hepatocytes in adult mice in vivo. Repair Drive involves transient conditioning of the liver by knocking down an essential gene, fumarylacetoacetate hydrolase ( Fah ), and delivering an untargetable version of the essential gene in cis with a therapeutic transgene. We show that Repair Drive increased the percentage of correctly targeted hepatocytes in healthy wild-type mice up to 25%, which resulted in a fivefold increased expression of a therapeutic transgene, human factor IX ( FIX ). Repair Drive was well tolerated and did not induce toxicity or tumorigenesis during a 1-year follow-up. This approach may broaden the range of liver diseases that can be treated with somatic genome editing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".