MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407394865 · doi:10.1016/j.lanmic.2024.101000

Safety and immunogenicity of an adjuvanted chikungunya virus virus-like particle (CHIKV VLP) vaccine in previous recipients of other alphavirus vaccines versus alphavirus vaccine-naive controls: an open-label, parallel-group, age-matched, sex-matched, phase 2 randomised controlled study

2025· article· en· W4407394865 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Microbe · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMosquito-borne diseases and control
Canadian institutionsNordic Life Science Pipeline (Canada)
FundersU.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious DiseasesUniformed Services University of the Health SciencesDefense Health AgencyU.S. Department of Defense
KeywordsAlphavirusImmunogenicityVirologyChikungunyaVirusTogaviridaeSerotypeVirus-like particleMedicineBiologyImmunologyImmune systemRecombinant DNAGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Immune responses to alphavirus vaccines might be impaired when heterologous alphavirus vaccines are administered sequentially. We aimed to compare immunogenicity and safety of a chikungunya virus virus-like particle (CHIKV VLP) vaccine in previous recipients of heterologous alphavirus vaccines with alphavirus-naive controls in the USA. METHODS: -transformed titre as the dependent variable, and study arm, age, and sex as predictors. Least squares means, difference, and 95% CIs were back-transformed and reported as geometric mean titres (GMTs). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03992872. FINDINGS: Between Nov 20, 2019, and Jan 19, 2021, 60 participants (20 [33%] female and 40 [67%] male; 40 (67%) White; median age 47·0 years [IQR 13·5]), 30 previous alphavirus vaccine recipients and 30 alphavirus vaccine-naive controls, were enrolled, vaccinated with CHIKV VLP, and completed the trial. The anti-CHIKV neutralising antibody seroconversion rate at day 22 was 100% (95% CI 88·6-100) in both groups. GMTs peaked in previous alphavirus vaccine recipients and alphavirus vaccine-naive controls at day 22 (2032·5 [95% CI 1413·0-2923·6] and 2299·2 [1598·1-3307·8], respectively) and were similar between the groups on day 22 and all subsequent visits. A higher proportion of previous alphavirus vaccine recipients (93·3% [95% CI 78·7-98·2]) had a four-fold neutralising antibody increase at day 8 than did alphavirus vaccine-naive controls (66·7% [48·8-80·8]; p=0·021). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of solicited adverse events between the previous alphavirus vaccine recipients and alphavirus vaccine-naive controls (53·3% vs 40·0%, respectively), although the relatively small sample size of the trial limited the power to detect a significant difference, and there were no reported vaccine-related serious adverse events. INTERPRETATION: CHIKV VLP vaccine was well tolerated and similarly immunogenic in both alphavirus vaccine-naive participants and previous recipients of a heterologous alphavirus vaccine. There were no significant differences in adverse events between the groups. The results of this study support the use of CHIKV VLP vaccine in individuals with previous alphavirus vaccine exposure. FUNDING: Defense Health Program, Emergent Travel Health, and Bavarian Nordic A/S.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.382
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it