MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407399885 · doi:10.1016/j.animal.2025.101462

How molting of laying hens influences body composition and blood parameters

2025· article· en· W4407399885 on OpenAlexaff
Lieske van Eck, Ethel Margaria, Mark Newcomb, H. Enting, R.P. Kwakkel

Bibliographic record

Venueanimal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology
Canadian institutionsCargill (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComposition (language)MoultingAnimal scienceFood scienceBiologyChemistryZoologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The physiological and metabolic changes laying hens undergo during molt are poorly understood, but could aid in understanding why hens stop egg production during the first cycle of lay. We therefore induced a molt and studied how this influenced body composition, blood parameters and production performance. Additionally, four diets postmolt were fed in a 2 × 2 factorial design with two levels of metabolisable energy lay (ME Lay; low = 11.0 MJ and high = 11.9 MJ) and two apparent faecal digestible lysine levels (AFD; low = 0.58% and high = 0.72%). Data were subjected to mixed model analyses. A molt was successfully induced at 58 weeks of age, during which hens stopped consuming feed and producing eggs, and lost on average 21% BW. Most of this BW loss was due to body breast weight loss (-56 g, time effect P < 0.05) and ovary loss (-33.6 g, time effect P < 0.05) and to a lesser extent due to fat pad loss (-7.1 g, time effect P > 0.05). Early laying rate and egg mass production of hens fed the high AFD Lys diets postmolt were significantly higher compared to hens fed the low AFD Lys diet. Egg weights of hens fed high AFD Lys diets were lower. Both effects were only short-term in weeks 59-62 and indicated that high amino acid intake is important for early laying rate in the second cycle of lay, potentially related to feather growth and restoration of body protein. Hens fed low ME Lay diets increased average daily feed intake (ADFI) in weeks 62-65, compared to hens fed high ME Lay diets (P < 0.05). This resulted in higher ME Lay and AFD Lys intake (P < 0.05). Hens fed these low ME Lay diets had a higher egg mass production in weeks 62-65 (P < 0.05), due to higher egg weights (P < 0.05), without a difference in laying rate (P > 0.05). Average daily gain was also significantly higher, mostly due to higher breast percentage (P < 0.05). Hens fed low ME Lay diets probably needed a higher lipoprotein production in the liver to meet the egg production demand, indicated by higher plasma cholesterol (P = 0.07) and triglyceride (P < 0.05) levels, and heavier liver weights (P < 0.05). In conclusion, molting significantly influenced the body composition of laying hens, with reduced breast, liver and ovary weights. Lower postmolt ME Lay diets increased breast, liver and ovary weights and increased egg weights and egg mass production. High AFD Lys diets only showed a short-term positive effect on the laying rate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.889
Threshold uncertainty score0.087

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueanimalSame topicAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207