MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407401779 · doi:10.1002/ajoc.202400612

Copper‐Catalyzed Synthesis of C‐2 Substituted Indolin‐3‐Ones and Indolin‐3‐One [4+2] Cycloadducts Through Azide‐Tethered Iodonium Ylides

2025· article· en· W4407401779 on OpenAlexafffund
Israel Najar Guerrero, Zinah Al‐Khateeb, F. G. West

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Journal of Organic Chemistry · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCatalytic C–H Functionalization Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGilead Sciences
KeywordsChemistryAzideCatalysisCopperMedicinal chemistryOrganic chemistryCombinatorial chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In recent years iodonium ylides have gained popularity as versatile metallocarbene precursors, functioning as alternatives to sensitive and potentially toxic diazo compounds. However, their application in metallocarbene‐mediated heterocycle construction has been limited. Herein, we describe a strategy for the synthesis of C‐2 substituted indolin‐3‐ones using azide‐tethered iodonium ylides as metallocarbene precursors under copper catalysis. The formation of an electrophilic C‐acylimine intermediate allows the addition of a broad spectrum of nucleophiles, as well as electron‐rich and unactivated dienes, furnishing highly substituted indolin‐3‐ones and indolen‐3‐one [4+2] cycloadducts. The remarkably short reaction times, high yields, mild conditions, and scalability render this methodology attractive for the synthesis of new scaffolds in drug discovery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsian Journal of Organic ChemistrySame topicCatalytic C–H Functionalization MethodsFrench-language works237,207