Chemical and isotopic fractionation during melt inclusion formation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Melt inclusions are used to study the origin and evolution of magmas. The extent to which they represent equilibrium melt compositions, however, critically hinges on the ratio of crystal growth rate to diffusion rate in melts. If the rate of crystal growth is limited by the supply of nutrients and the dissipation of unwanted components, the trapped melt will be depleted in compatible elements and enriched in incompatible elements. Despite widespread recognition of the potential for melt inclusions to trap disequilibrium compositions, their identification remains a challenge. Here, we demonstrate how stable isotopes provide a solution to this problem. Melt inclusions in basaltic tephra from Kīlauea volcano, Hawai‘i, display Mg isotope fractionation up to 0.49‰ (26Mg/24Mg) relative to bulk rock. These observations indicate that kinetic processes, such as chemical diffusion, are at play, as equilibrium mineral-melt isotope fractionation at high temperatures is an order of magnitude smaller. We propose that the heavy Mg isotopic compositions of the melt inclusions were generated by the faster diffusion and thus preferential incorporation of 24Mg by the growing olivine, leaving the slower diffusant (26Mg) behind. The incompatible elements (e.g., Ca, Ti, and K) are predicted to display similarly large fractionations when boundary layer effects are significant. These findings show that stable isotopes can be a useful tool in identifying disequilibrium compositions in melt inclusions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".