The spatiotemporal distribution of LIN-5/NuMA regulates spindle orientation in the C. elegans germ line
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mitotic spindle orientation contributes to tissue organization and shape by setting the cell division plane. How spindle orientation is coupled to diverse tissue architectures is incompletely understood. The C. elegans gonad is a tube-shaped organ with germ cells forming a circumferential monolayer around a common cytoplasmic lumen. How this organization is maintained during development is unclear, as germ cells lack the canonical cell-cell junctions that ensure spindle orientation in other tissue types. Here, we show that the microtubule force generator dynein and its conserved regulator LIN-5/NuMA regulate germ cell spindle orientation and are required for germline tissue organization. We uncover a cyclic, polarized pattern of LIN-5/NuMA cortical localization that predicts centrosome positioning throughout the cell cycle, providing a means to align spindle orientation with the tissue plane. This work reveals a new mechanism by which oriented cell division can be achieved to maintain tissue organization during animal development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".