MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407421108 · doi:10.1002/brb3.70318

Effects of Low Intensity Focused Ultrasound Stimulation Combined With Functional Electrical Stimulation on Corticospinal Excitability and Upper Extremity Fine Motor Function

2025· article· en· W4407421108 on OpenAlexafffund
Naaz Kapadia, Talyta Grippe, Tarun Arora, Amitabh Bhattacharya, Carolyn Gunraj, Robert Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain and Behavior · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Canadian institutionsToronto Western HospitalOntario Brain InstituteUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsFunctional electrical stimulationTranscranial direct-current stimulationNeuroplasticityTranscranial magnetic stimulationStimulationMedicinePhysical medicine and rehabilitationMotor cortexBrain stimulationPsychologyNeuroscienceInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Functional electrical stimulation (FES) is used to retrain motor function in neurological disorders but typically requires multiple sessions and shows limited benefits in chronic cases. Low-intensity transcranial focused ultrasound stimulation (TUS) is a noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) method offering greater focality and deeper penetration than current NIBS techniques. TUS delivered in a theta burst pattern (tbTUS) for 80 s produces neuroplastic changes with long-term potentiation-like effects lasting up to 60 min in healthy adults. Since tbTUS increases cortical excitability, combining it with FES may enhance neuroplasticity. We hypothesized that combining tbTUS with FES would result in increased corticospinal excitability compared to FES alone and lead to greater improvement in fine motor skills as assessed by Nine-Hole Peg Test (NHPT) scores. METHODS: Fifteen healthy participants underwent two study visits consisting of real or sham tbTUS of the left motor cortex immediately followed by 30 min of FES of the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) and the opponens pollicis (OP) muscles for fine motor function training of the right hand. Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the right FDI, OP, and abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscles at baseline (BL), immediately after real or sham tbTUS (T0), immediately after 30 min of FES training (T45), and at 15 (T65) and 30 min (T80) post-FES. NHPT was delivered at BL and at T80. RESULTS: Data from 14 participants were analyzed. It showed a significant decrease in MEP amplitudes of FDI and OP at T45 following only real tbTUS+FES with a return to BL at T80. No significant changes were seen in the NHPT scores in either condition. CONCLUSION: Real tbTUS+FES combined with voluntary movement results in immediate corticospinal inhibition with a return to BL at ∼20 min post-stimulation suggestive of homeostatic metaplasticity. These findings highlight the potential of tbTUS+FES as a neuromodulatory intervention, warranting further exploration in neurological conditions for therapeutic applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.693
Threshold uncertainty score0.622

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrain and BehaviorSame topicTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesFrench-language works237,207