MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407425675 · doi:10.7860/jcdr/2025/76437.20611

Effectiveness of Radiofrequency Ablation of Genicular Nerves in the Treatment of Chronic Knee Pain due to Degenerative Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Interventional Study

2025· article· en· W4407425675 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
G Siddalingamurthy, Srinivas Hebbal Thammaiah, Ankit Gupta, V Sheshagiri, Madhukesh Rudramurthy

Bibliographic record

VenueJOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicShoulder Injury and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOsteoarthritisRadiofrequency ablationSurgeryProspective cohort studyAblationPulsed radiofrequencyPain reliefInternal medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) has a long history dating back to 1931, with applications in treating various pain conditions. Given its established efficacy in managing spinal facet joint pain and its emerging popularity in treating arthritic knee pain through Genicular Nerve RFA (GNRFA), it is essential to investigate the effectiveness of traditional RFA in alleviating knee pain due to degenerative Osteoarthritis (OA) in patients with advanced OA who are not candidates for Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of RFA of genicular nerves in reducing chronic knee pain due to degenerative OA. Materials and Methods: This prospective interventional study was conducted at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, JSS Medical College, Mysore, Karnataka, India over a period of one year from July 2022 to June 2023. A total of 38 patients with chronic knee pain resulting from degenerative OA underwent RFA of genicular nerves, with assessments conducted at four time points: baseline, one month, three months and six months postprocedure. The evaluations utilised the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) to measure pain levels, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) to evaluate functional outcomes, and monitored analgesic usage to track pain management, providing a comprehensive understanding of the treatment’s effectiveness in alleviating chronic knee pain. The Friedman test was used to study the effectiveness of RFA of genicular nerves in reducing knee pain due to degenerative OA, and the pairwise Wilcoxon test with Bonferroni correction was used to compare statistical significance between different pairs. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Substantial reductions were noted in pain levels, both at rest and during movement, as evidenced by significant reductions (p-value <0.001) in NRS scores, alongside improvements in WOMAC scores and decreased analgesic usage at all follow-up assessments compared to baseline (p-value <0.05). Conclusion: The study found that GNRFA significantly reduces pain and improves function in patients with chronic knee OA. This minimally invasive procedure is a safe, effective and costefficient treatment option for OA patients who rely heavily on analgesics, are unsuitable for surgery, or experience persistent pain after Total Knee Replacement (TKR).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.085
Threshold uncertainty score0.898

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.488
Teacher spread0.404 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCHSame topicShoulder Injury and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207