An Exploration of Ball Game Momentum Fluctuations Based on Multiple Regression Analysis and Convolutional Neural Networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this study is to explore the patterns of player momentum fluctuations in tennis matches through a model combining multiple regression analysis and convolutional neural network (CNN). The study first analyzes real-time match data using analysis of variance (ANOVA) to identify the key factors that affect players' scores. Based on these factors, a multivariate regression analysis model is constructed for evaluating players' winning ability and their performance at specific moments. Then, the game data are deeply analyzed by convolutional neural networks to capture the fluctuating trends of player momentum. In addition, this paper verifies the non-randomness of momentum fluctuation by hypothesis testing method, which proves that the fluctuation of momentum in a match has a certain regularity and is closely related to the performance of players. The innovation of this study is that an analytical framework combining multiple regression and convolutional neural network is proposed, which not only improves the accuracy of momentum prediction, but also provides a new idea for dynamic analysis and optimal training of tennis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it