Hypo- and Hypernatremia in Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants in the First 10 Days of Life: A Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Sodium regulation is critical in extremely low birth weight (ELBW, <1000 g) infants. This study aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of sodium dynamics and related variables in ELBW infants in their first 10 days of life through a structured literature review. METHODS: Applying PRISMA guidelines, six databases were searched (1 August 2023) on sodium measurements in ELBW cohorts, with quality assessment (RoB2, ROBINS-1, Newcastle Ottawa scale) of retained papers, and subsequent data extraction in line with these PRISMA guidelines to describe findings. RESULTS: Only eight heterogeneous studies could be retained, including observational cohort studies (n = 5), case-control studies (n = 2, Tegaderm application yes/no, gestational age < 24 or 24-28 weeks), and only one randomized trial (sodium restriction versus no sodium restriction). Definitions of hyper- or hyponatremia were also heterogeneous, with incidence ranges for hyper- (8-92.2%) and hyponatremia (0-52.9%). Peak sodium values were observed on days 2-4 in the individual studies. When pooled and compared to the cohort mean sodium values, the highest increases in mean serum sodium values were observed on day 3 (+4, range, -0.6 to +8.6 mEq). Variables of sodium values were related to care factors [incubator settings (open/closed, double-/not double-walled, humidity), fluid regimens (water volume, sodium supplementation), occlusive skin care], as well as related maturational factors (postnatal age, gestational age, small versus appropriate for gestational age, SGA/AGA). CONCLUSIONS: Based on a structured literature review, patterns of sodium changes over postnatal age in ELBW cases were documented. Besides incubator settings, fluid regimens, or occlusive skin care, these patterns also depend on maturational factors of the ELBW infant (gestational age, postnatal age, SGA/AGA). These complexities emphasize the need for nuanced interpretation, the relevance of standardizing clinical practices and research definitions, and the need to report on additional datasets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.015 | 0.013 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".