MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

DISCONTINUOUS JOURNEYS: READING ANITA RAO BADAMI’S CAN YOU HEAR THE NIGHTBIRD CALL? AS A SOUTH ASIAN CANADIAN DIASPORIC TEXT

2023· article· en· W4407516304 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueShodhKosh Journal of Visual and Performing Arts · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReading (process)LinguisticsHistoryArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper explores the South Asian Canadian diaspora through Anita Rao Badami's novel Can You Hear the Nightbird Call? It discusses the significant presence of the South Asian Canadian diaspora in Canada since the 1970s, highlighting their contributions to the economy, politics, and culture while maintaining their cultural heritage. It notes the challenges and successes faced by this community, particularly in terms of immigration, inclusion, and identity while dealing with the diasporic sensibilities and experiences of families from Punjab and South India, weaving significant historical events like: • The Partition of India • The Komagata Maru incident • Indira Gandhi's assassination • The 1984 anti-Sikh riots Can You Hear the Nightbird Call? is a complex narrative addressing historical trauma and memory, using the symbol of the nightbird's call to represent freedom, hope, and cultural heritage. The novel's characters, such as Sharanjit Kaur (Bibi-ji) and Leela Bhat, embody the struggles of displacement, identity, and cultural assimilation. The paper highlights how these characters navigate their hybrid identities and the impact of political events on their lives. It discusses broader themes of existential rootlessness, alienation, and the quest for identity common in diasporic literature. In conclusion, the paper asserts that Badami's novel captures the fractured identities and discontinuous journeys of its diasporic characters, effectively intertwining personal narratives with significant political upheavals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.802
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueShodhKosh Journal of Visual and Performing ArtsSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207