MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4407530116 · doi:10.14740/jocmr6145

Metabolomics for Distinguishing Cardiovascular Risk in Rheumatoid Arthritis Across Different Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug Therapies

2025· article· en· W4407530116 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Inga Claus, Meike Hoffmeister, Selina Strathmeyer, Steffen Heelemann, Werner Dammermann, Oliver Ritter, Daniel Patschan, Susann Patschan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Medicine Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRheumatoid arthritisAntirheumatic drugsDrugDiseaseMetabolomicsPharmacologyAntirheumatic AgentsInternal medicineBioinformatics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) significantly increases the overall risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). In addition to conventional risk factors, the inflammatory activity of the disease itself and medications that promote atherosclerosis contribute to an even greater risk. In this study, we performed metabolomic analysis in RA patients, both on and off disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy, with the aim of identifying new candidates for more sophisticated cardiovascular risk (CVR) assessment. Methods: This is an observational, cross-sectional investigation that included patients with established RA. DMARD therapy, if prescribed, consisted of methotrexate (MTX) alone or in combination with other conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (cDMARDs) or biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs), or other cDMARDs or bDMARDs without MTX, respectively. Metabolomic profiling was conducted using a Bruker AVANCE NEO 600 MHz nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectrometer. The spectra obtained were Fourier transformed using TopSpin software (version 4.0, Bruker Biospin, Germany). All spectra were automatically phased and subjected to baseline correction. Subsequently, the spectra were analyzed using the proprietary Profiler software (version 1.4_Blood, lifespin GmbH, Germany), and a quantitative metabolite list was generated. Results: In total, 200 patients were included in the study, 54 subjects were not receiving any DMARDs (n = 47 untreated at the time of inclusion, n = 7 with established disease but not receiving DMARD therapy), and 146 were receiving DMARD treatment. No metabolic differences were found in relation to drug therapy or RA activity. The following CVR factors were associated with significant metabolic abnormalities: distress, arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus and an average higher Framingham score. Distressed individuals showed abnormalities in histidine metabolism. Conclusions: Our findings have aided in the identification of potential surrogate markers for assessing the burden of CVD in individuals with RA. Histidine may be of particular diagnostic importance in CVR assessment in RA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.461
Teacher spread0.377 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Medicine Research→Same topicMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies→French-language works237,207→