MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407545245 · doi:10.1177/13860291241306568

Prevention of ischemia-reperfusion injury on the porcine model of supra-renal aortic clamp by sulodexide <sup/>

2025· article· en· W4407545245 on OpenAlexaff
Ludek Hana, Katerina Tlapakova, Dana Čížková, Alena Tichá, Christine Lehmann, Vladimír Černý, Robert G. Hahn, Jaromír Kočí, David Astapenko

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTrauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMicrocirculationPeritubular capillariesGlycocalyxUrologyThrombomodulinReperfusion injuryIschemiaAlbuminuriaInternal medicineAnesthesiaPathologyKidneyPlateletImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background The ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) is unavoidable in vascular surgery. Damage to the microcirculation and endothelial glycocalyx might set up a shock with loss of circulatory coherence and organ failure. Sulodexide may help to protect endothelial glycocalyx and alleviate the ischemia-reperfusion injury. Methods Twenty female piglets underwent surgery with a 30-min-long suprarenal aortic clamp, followed by two hours of reperfusion. Ten piglets received sulodexide before the clamp, and 10 received normal saline. Blood and urine samples were taken at baseline and in 20-min intervals until the 120 th minute to analyze the serum syndecan-1, E-selectin, and thrombomodulin. Albumin and glycosaminoglycans were examined in the urine. The kidney biopsies before and after the protocol were examined by light microscopy with hematoxylin-eosin staining. The sublingual microcirculation was recorded by side-stream dark field imaging at the time as blood and urine. Results Based on the 2-way ANOVA testing, there was no statistically significant difference in the parameters of sublingual microcirculation. Serum markers of endothelial cell activation and damage (E-selectin and thrombomodulin) did not show any statistically significant difference either. Syndecan-1, a marker of glycocalyx damage, showed statistically significantly higher values based on the 2-way ANOVA testing (p &lt; 0.0001) with the highest difference in the 80 th minute: 7.8 (3.9–44) ng/mL in the control group and 1.8 (0.67–2.8) ng/mL in the sulodexide group. In the urine, the albuminuria was higher in the control group, although not statistically significant. Glycosaminoglycans were statistically significantly higher in the sulodexide group based on the mixed-effect analysis due to the intervention itself. Histological analysis of the renal biopsies showed necrosis in both groups after reperfusion. Conclusion Administering sulodexide significantly reduced the level of endothelial markers of IRI. The study results support further research into using preemptive administration of sulodexide to modulate IRI in clinical medicine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.498

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Hemorheology and MicrocirculationSame topicTrauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, ResuscitationFrench-language works237,207