MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407565958 · doi:10.1038/s41405-025-00308-w

Frequency and factors associated with the utilization (curative and preventive) of oral health care services among pregnant women in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo

2025· article· en· W4407565958 on OpenAlex
Patrick Marob-Ndjock Sekele, Erick Ntambwe Kamangu, Harry César Kayembe Ntumba, Fatiha Chandad, Jacques Ileboso Bolenge, Stéphanie Mikalo Mbambi, Jean-Paul Isouradi-Bourley Sekele, Em Kazadi Kalala, Fidele Bushabu Nyimi, Pierre Akilimali

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBDJ Open · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDentistry
TopicOral microbiology and periodontitis research
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePregnancyOdds ratioLogistic regressionHealth carePopulationConfidence intervalFamily medicineCross-sectional studyObstetricsEnvironmental healthPediatricsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) has one of the highest maternal and neonatal mortality rates in Africa. There is a growing body of evidence about the relationship between poor oral health and adverse pregnancy outcomes. However, there is a lack of information about oral health status during pregnancy in the DRC. This study aimed to identify the factors related to the utilization of oral health care services among pregnant women. METHODS: A hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted in four health facilities representing each administrative district of the city of Kinshasa, between March and May, 2021. The study population comprised pregnant women aged at least 18 or over attending antenatal care (ANC), selected using a simple random sampling technique. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire. Multivariable logistic regression was employed to identify factors associated with the outcome variable using the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with its 95% confidence interval (95% CI) and p value < 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 5% of the 500 pregnant women who participated in the study were identified as users of oral healthcare services. 15% of pregnant women were aware of the necessity of oral health care during pregnancy, while 58% indicated that dental visits for routine and/or treatment purposes were not a priority during pregnancy. Factors associated with its utilization were knowledge of the need for oral health care during pregnancy (AOR:3.62, 95% CI: 1.42-9.26), knowledge of the importance of routine visits or dental treatment for oral diseases during pregnancy (AOR: 4.94, 95% CI: 1.70-16.73), and having experience oral health problem during the current pregnancy (AOR: 3.13, 95% CI: 1.22-8.21). CONCLUSION: The utilization of oral health care services during pregnancy is very low. Appropriate public health initiatives are urgently needed to facilitate collaboration between health professionals to integrate oral and dental consultations, oral health counseling, and check-ups as an essential component of routine ANC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.950

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it