MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407569203 · doi:10.1186/s12891-025-08290-y

Implication of region-dependent material properties of articular cartilage in the contact mechanics of porcine knee joint

2025· article· en· W4407569203 on OpenAlexafffund
Erfan Hamsayeh Abbasi Niasar, LePing Li

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsArticular cartilageMedicineSports medicineKnee JointOrthopedic surgeryJoint (building)Contact mechanicsCartilageRheumatologyAnatomyOsteoarthritisInternal medicinePathologySurgeryStructural engineeringEngineeringFinite element method

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The site-specific tissue properties of knee cartilage may play an essential role in knee joint mechanical function, and mitigate joint injury and cartilage degeneration. The present study aimed to determine the significance of tissue inhomogeneity in knee joint contact mechanics using a porcine model. METHODS: Finite element models were developed for a porcine knee with intact and total meniscectomy conditions to simulate whole-joint compression-relaxation tests under a 1.2-mm ramp-compression at 0.01, 0.1, or 1 mm/s. Two reference benchmarks were introduced for the implementation of poromechanical material properties of fibril-reinforced cartilage: Benchmark II consisted of 17 sets of cartilage properties, each for a region in the knee, representing site-specific inhomogeneity averaged from cartilage indentation maps of 14 porcine knees. Benchmark I was comprised of a single set of properties by taking the average properties of 17 regions in Benchmark II, assuming tissue homogeneity. To validate the modeling method, the reference benchmarks were used to produce results against whole-joint compression test data. RESULTS: Both benchmarks were able to approximate experimental force-compression data obtained from the same knee with intact menisci and total meniscectomy, provided that the average properties from 14 knees were appropriately scaled to account for individual joint differences. Noticeable differences in stress and pressure distributions were observed between the benchmarks. For instance, benchmark I generated higher peak contact and fluid pressures in the medial tibial cartilage, but benchmark II produced the higher ones in the lateral tibial cartilage. The load sharing asymmetry between the lateral and medial compartments was reduced in benchmark II which was more pronounced for higher compression rates. On the other hand, benchmark II produced a more uniform stress distribution or lower maxima. Meniscectomy caused a slight shift of the contact centers in the tibial plateaus as compared to the intact joint. CONCLUSION: The modeling results demonstrated substantial differences in loading distributions in the joint between the homogeneous and nonhomogeneous models represented by the two benchmarks, indicating the role of tissue inhomogeneity in the joint contact mechanics. Region-dependent tissue properties may need to be implemented in joint mechanical modeling to evaluate the site of cartilage prone to injury or degeneration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.386

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC Musculoskeletal DisordersSame topicOsteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207