MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Application of Autonomous Robotics for En-Masse Coolant Channel Replacement Program

2023· article· en· W4407575468 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rajat Jayantilal Rathod, Himanshu K. Patel, Priyank Jayantilal Rathod

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCyclone Separators and Fluid Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceCoolantRoboticsManufacturing engineeringOperating systemRobotEngineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper summarizes current knowledge and practices used in India's En-Masse coolant channel replacement (EMCCR) program. The requisite of coolant channel replacement of the Indian pressurized heavy water reactor (PHWR) or Canadian Deuterium Uranium (CANDU) reactor type is essential which faces a big challenge in the current methodology. Current development uses partial automation and a power manipulator to do remote maintenance work in the EMCCR program. This program and process require various improvements to maintain international standards and operating procedures. Working in a high radiation area creates a lot of challenges to perform a critical components replacement and maintenance process. With the help of robotics and automation, the operation time and efforts of radiation workers in the radiation environment can be reduced. This paper describes available knowledge of various processes, measurement tools, mechanical components, and techniques used for standard safety practice in nuclear reactor components. It also suggests the implementation of robotics and automation systems to do autonomous operation and maintenance work in the industry. Primary research results of implementing automation, and robotics systems can be helpful to add additional safety for such a high radiation environment. The development can also reduce the time and cost applied for operation and maintenance work in nuclear power plants. This research will help industries to propose new designs and development of robotic manipulators, and automation systems for the operation and maintenance work in the nuclear industry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCyclone Separators and Fluid DynamicsFrench-language works237,207