MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407577646 · doi:10.1111/jmg.12808

Polyphase Metamorphism of the Northern Rae Craton (Baffin Island, Arctic Canada) and Trace Element Behaviour in Monazite: Insights From Phase Equilibria Modelling and Geochronology

2025· article· en· W4407577646 on OpenAlexaffabout
D R Skipton, N Wodicka, Owen Weller, Simon E. Jackson, Marc St‐Onge, B M Saumur, Duane C. Petts

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Metamorphic Geology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à MontréalGovernment of Newfoundland and LabradorGeological Survey of CanadaNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonaziteGeochronologyGeologyMetamorphismPolyphase systemTrace elementArcticGeochemistryCratonKyaniteOceanographyPaleontologyZirconTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Integrated field mapping, phase equilibria modelling and in situ U–Pb monazite geochronology from the northern margin of the Rae craton on Baffin Island document three metamorphic events during the Neoarchean to the middle Paleoproterozoic. The Qimivvik area comprises Neoarchean tonalitic gneiss structurally juxtaposed over Neoarchean metasedimentary rocks along the Paleoproterozoic Qimivvik thrust and associated shear zone. High‐grade metamorphism at ca. 2.56–2.50 Ga supports a footprint for cryptic late Neoarchean metamorphism over a distance of ∼600 km along the northwestern Rae margin from southern Boothia Peninsula to northern Baffin Island. Thermal peak mineral assemblages in the Qimivvik area equilibrated at ca. 1.9 Ga at conditions of ~710°C–790°C and 4.3–5.5 kbar. The dominant Paleoproterozoic foliation is defined by peak metamorphic phases and is reoriented by folds related to the Qimivvik thrust. Peak metamorphism and associated deformation, including the Qimivvik thrust, are interpreted as a manifestation of the Ellesmere‐Inglefield belt of Ellesmere Island and West Greenland, which links with the ca. 1.9 Ga Thelon orogen of western Canada. Partial melting also occurred at ca. 1.8 Ga, possibly resulting from decompression of the Churchill domain following the collisional‐accretionary events related to the late stages of amalgamation of Laurentia and supercontinent Nuna. Quantitative trace element maps (acquired using LA‐ICP‐MS) of monazite reveal distinct trace element signatures associated with each of three growth stages. Ca. 2.5 Ga monazite exhibits complex intragrain compositional zoning, has elevated Y and heavy rare earth elements (HREEs) relative to ca. 1.9 Ga monazite and has higher Th/U overall than both ca. 1.9 Ga and ca. 1.8 Ga monazite. These signatures suggest that ca. 2.5 Ga monazite growth was concomitant with partial melting and preceded the majority of garnet growth. The ca. 1.9 Ga monazite grains are comparatively less zoned and have lower Y + HREE contents than both ca. 2.5 Ga and 1.8 Ga monazite, consistent with the ca. 1.9 Ga monazite forming after most garnet growth. Elevated Y + HREE in the ca. 1.8 Ga monazite imply that it formed after retrograde resorption of garnet rims. In our samples, Y + HREE generally exhibit stronger correlations with monazite age and/or petrographic context than Eu/Eu* and Th/U. As some compositional overlap exists between monazite of different ages and petrographic contexts, quantitative limits (‘cut‐offs’) based on trace element concentrations or ratios (e.g., Th/U, Eu/Eu*, LaCN/YbCN) are unreliable for distinguishing between monazite populations. In addition to providing important constraints on the early tectonic evolution of northeastern Laurentia, our study offers new insights into trace element behaviour in a key accessory mineral during three metamorphic events occurring over a ~700 Ma time period.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.104

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Metamorphic GeologySame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207