Weather-Adaptive Regenerative Braking Strategy Based on Driving Style Recognition for Intelligent Electric Vehicles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper examines the energy efficiency of smart electric vehicles equipped with regenerative braking systems under challenging weather conditions. While Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) are primarily designed to enhance driving safety, they often overlook energy efficiency. This study proposes a Weather-Adaptive Regenerative Braking Strategy (WARBS) system, which leverages onboard sensors and data processing capabilities to enhance the energy efficiency of regenerative braking across diverse weather conditions while minimizing unnecessary alerts. To achieve this, we develop driving style recognition models that integrate road conditions, such as weather and road friction, with different driving styles. Next, we propose an adaptive deceleration plan that aims to maximize the conversion of kinetic energy into electrical energy for the vehicle's battery under varying weather conditions, considering vehicle dynamics and speed constraints. Given that the potential for energy recovery through regenerative braking is diminished on icy and snowy roads compared to dry ones, our approach introduces a driving context recognition system to facilitate effective speed planning. Both simulation and experimental validation indicate that this approach can significantly enhance overall energy efficiency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".