MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407579087 · doi:10.1115/1.4067925

Adjuster Absorber Rods Return to Service at PLNGS

2025· article· en· W4407579087 on OpenAlexaff
Jaswin Krishnamoorthy, Dominique Deveaux, Derek Mullin, Can Usalp, Liqun Sun, J. Sharpe, Daniel Rouben

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical Failure Analysis and Simulation
Canadian institutionsEnergie NB Power (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRodMaterials scienceNuclear engineeringMechanical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The original CANDU® 600 design utilizes adjuster absorber (AA) rods to flatten the flux shape in the reactor core optimize power output, compensate for fuel burnup, provide excess reactivity to overcome 135Xe buildup following a power reduction, and allow for reactivity shim. At Point Lepreau Nuclear Generating Station (PLNGS) in 1999, adjuster absorber banks 6 and 7 were locked in the reactor core and removed from service. Later in 2019, adjuster absorber banks 1–5 were placed on manual. Since then, a significant program was put in place to restore adjuster banks 1–6 to service, which was successfully completed in October 2023. Adjuster absorber bank 7 remains locked in-core. This paper summarizes the rationale for removing the PLNGS adjuster absorbers from service, the effort required for their restoration, applicable lessons learned, and next steps.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.141
Threshold uncertainty score0.223

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation ScienceSame topicMechanical Failure Analysis and SimulationFrench-language works237,207