MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407581176 · doi:10.5539/jms.v15n1p1

Institutional Trust and Affordability on Mobile Banking Adoption in Ghana: A System Dynamic Approach

2025· article· en· W4407581176 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Laud Ammah, Alexander Kriebitz, Luetge Christoph

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Management and Sustainability · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEconomic Growth and Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMobile bankingBusinessMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Trust between mobile applications and humans is critical for a successful adoption in our society. This study aims to investigate mobile-banking (m-banking) adoption from an institutional trust (ICT performance and Fraud) and affordable mobile broad band point of view and their impact on m-banking adoption in Ghana. In this paper, we extended the Bass diffusion model using system dynamic approach and incorporated fraud, ICT performance and affordability of m-banking services and their effects on m-banking adoption in Ghana. The model is built using system dynamic methodologies (stock and flows), validated to confirm a real-life m-banking adoption behaviour, and simulated to analyse m-banking adoption response under different scenarios. The result shows that improving ICT infrastructure development, preventing cybercrime and reducing the cost of mobile data have a positive impact on m-banking adoption. However, affordability is the primary determinant of m-banking adoption in Ghana, although it can also be enhanced through tax incentives and policy schemes related to mobile communication technologies. The model currently relies on monetary aspects of ICT infrastructure, cybercrime, and broadband data pricing. However, to enhance the model’s reliability, it could be beneficial to expand its scope to include non-monetary factors and other relevant economic variables.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.657
Threshold uncertainty score0.350

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Management and SustainabilitySame topicEconomic Growth and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207