MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407602924 · doi:10.32764/saintekbu.v1i2.83

KOREKSI BIAS ESTIMATOR KERNEL DENGAN BOOTSTRAP

2016· article· id· W4407602924 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSAINTEKBU · 2016
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputer Science and Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEstimatorStatisticsKernel (algebra)MathematicsDiscrete mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Algoritma resampling merupakan metode praktis dan simpel untuk mengatasi bias pada regresi kernel seperti pada kernel Nadaraya-Watson dan Locally Linear order dua. Penelitian ini berfokus untuk mendapatkan estimator kernel dengan menetapkan polinomial lokal dan estimasi  digunakan least square terbobot. Pada metode yang sama juga akan didapatkan persamaan bias, variansi dan Mean Square Error (MSE). Aplikasi kernel pada data penelitian Canadian Males oleh Murphy dan Welch (1990) menunjukkan bahwa dengan estimasi bootstrap akan menurunkan nilai bias, variansi dan MSE serta dengan improved bootstrap akan lebih memperkecil nilai–nilai tersebut. Kurva regresi yang dibentuk dari estimasi bootstrap akan membentuk permukaan yang smooth. Kata Kunci dan Phrasa: Estimasi Nonparametrik, Improved Bootstrap dan Polinomial Lokal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.900
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it